Geography

Geography

Spatial analysis of the effect of social capital on the viability of urban neighborhoods Case study: Maragheh neighborhoods

Authors
1 Department of Human Geography, Management and Urban Planning, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of Human Geography, Management and Urban Planning, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
Abstract
Urban livability is complex and affected by many factors. according to goals, different approaches are used to measure the livability. The purpose of this research is to analyze the role of social capital on livability of Maragheh neighborhoods. The present study consists of three stages: the study of the livability of neighborhoods, social capital Survey of neighborhoods and Finally, an assessment of the impact of social capital indicators on the level of urban livability. The number of livability indicators was 15. Social capital indicators were 5 main indicators and 39 sub-indicators. The research method has been descriptive – analytical. Data collection was field survey and the tool for data collection questionnaires. the sample size is 383. for data analysis, Multiple Regression and Geographically Weighted Regression has been used. The results show that the results of Geographically Weighted Regression has a better reliability than multivariate regression due to the nature of spatial data. The coefficient of social capital impact has been positive in most neighborhoods of the city of Maragheh. The results showed that 90 percent of the livability of Maragheh neighborhoods is estimated by social capital indicators, these results show the important and influential role of social capital on the livability of urban neighborhoods
Keywords

  1.  

    1. Appleyard, Donald. )1981( Livable streets. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    2. Benzeval, M., Judge, K., & W hitehead, M. (1995). Tackling inequalities in health London, England: Kings Fund
    3. Bosselmann, Peter, & Arens, Edward. )1990( Sun, wind, and pedestrian comfort: A study of Toronto's central area . Toronto: City of Toronto
    4. Cooper Marcus, Clare, & Francis, Carolyn, eds. ) 1990( People places:Design guidelines for urban open space . New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold
    5. Cooper Marcus, Clare, & Sarkissian, Wendy) 1986( Housing as if people mattered. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    6. Crowhurst Lennard, Suzanne H., & Lennard, Henry L.. ) 1995( Livable communities observed. Carmel: Gondolier Press.
    7. Hills, J. (1995). Inquiry into income and wealth (Vol. 2). York, England: Joseph Rowntree Foundation
    8. Jacobs, Allan.) 1993( Great streets . Cambridge: MIT Press
    9. Jacobs, Jane. )1961( The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage
    10. Lynch, Kevin (1981) A theory of good city form. Cambridge: MIT Press
    11. Narayan, D. and Pritchett, L. (1999). Cents and Sociability: Household Income and Social Capital in Rural Tanzania. Economic Development and Cultural Change. Vol. 47(4), pages871 897.
    12. North Central Texas Council of Governments(2011). Mobility 2035. Retrieved from http://www.nctcog.org
    13. Pacione, M. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human wellbeingd a socialgeographical perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65,19 e30
    14. Putnam, R D )2000( Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster, New York,.
    15.  Ruth,M & Franklin, R(2014) Livability for all? Conc eptual limits and practical implications, Applied Geography 49 (2014) 18 e23
    16. Shamsuddin, S; Abu Hassanb,N; Bilyamin, S(2012) Walkable Environment in Increasing the Liveability of a City, ASEAN Conference on Environment-Behaviour Studies .Bangkok, Thailand, 16-18 July 2012, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 50 ( 2012 ) 167 – 178
    17. Wheeler ,S(2001) Livable Communities: Creating Safe and Livable Neighborhoods, Towns, and Regions in California, University of California at Berkeley Institute of Urban and Regional Development.
    18. Coleman, J.S., (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology 94, 95–120
    19. Forrest, R., Kearns, A.,( 2001) Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood.Urban Studies 38, 2125–2143.
    20. -House, J.S., Landis, K.R., Umberson, D., (1988) Social relationships and health. Science241, 540–545
    21. Storper, M., Venables, A.J., (2004) Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy.Journal of Economic Geography 4, 351–370