Geography

Geography

Geographical analysis of social polarization in Isfahan metropolis

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
1 Assistant Professor of Geography and Urban Planning, Seyed Jamaluddin Asadabadi University, Asadabad, Iran
2 PhD in Geography and Rural Planning, Isfahan University, Isfahan, Iran
Abstract
Extended Abstract
Introduction
Polarization and social duality is a complex phenomenon that has affected large cities and contemporary metropolises. This phenomenon has emerged under the capitalist system influence and the centralist policies of governments. Iranian cities have been affected by this phenomenon due to peripheral and quasi-capitalist policies. It have caused the country's metropolises to become a heterogeneous city in terms of social environment due to increasing social and economic distance and unequal distribution of facilities and services. As a result, urban society is deeply polarized. Thus, economic polarization and social polarization have intensified. In the meantime, the metropolis of Isfahan has not been deprived of this economic and social polarization. According to the statistics of the Ministry of Roads and Urban Development (2019), about 23.35% of population,  live in dysfunctional textures with rural backgrounds, informal settlement, middle contexts and historically dysfunctional textures, which is equivalent to 436,453 people.  These textures have prominent characteristics such as inefficient infrastructure, low services, low-strength buildings, high social damage, etc.
 Also, according to the reports of the Parliamentary Research Center, the poverty rate of this city has been announced as 11.95%. In fact, the clustering of social differentiation and thus the formation of social polarization has intensified and class distance and duality in urban space have become geographical and spatial. Continuation of this situation will cause the metropolis of Isfahan to be swallowed up by the marginalized and poor population. If no precautionary measures are taken, the text of the city will soon be digested in the stomachs of the suburbs and its poor. Accordingly, the aim of the present study is zoning and spatial analysis of social polarization at the level of statistical blocks of Isfahan metropolis.
 
Methodology
The present article is applied in terms of purpose and descriptive-analytical in terms of method. The statistical population of this research is the statistical blocks of Isfahan metropolis in 2016. The research data has prepared from the statistical blocks (2016) of the Statistics Center of Iran. AHP and Topsis models have been used to data analysis, compilation of indicators and final social polarization index extraction. Also, exploratory methods, ie Hotspot model, have been used  for measurement  of cluster or random social polarization in Isfahan metropolis. Arc / GIS software has been used for indexing and mapping.
 
 
Results and discussion
Findings has show that major indicators have the greatest impact on social polarization in the city of Isfahan, which are literacy, household in housing unit, marital status, women's employment and place of birth. The impact coefficients of these indicators are 0.299, 0.254, 0.166, 0.147 and 0.134, respectively. Also, the situation of neighborhoods in terms of social polarization indicators is as follows: 24 neighborhoods (12.5%) good quality, 57 neighborhoods (29.69%) relatively good quality, 46 neighborhoods (23.96%) average, 40 neighborhoods ( 20.8%) relatively unsuitable and finally 25 neighborhoods equivalent to 13% unsuitable. In fact, more than 33% of the city's neighborhoods are socially unacceptable. Therefore, most of the neighborhoods of Isfahan metropolis are in average and unfavorable condition (more than 55% in total) and a kind of social differentiation has been created in this city in terms of space. As a result, social polarization in the metropolis has found a geographical or spatial dimension.Neighborhoods with higher than average values are located in the center and to some extent in the north of the city and neighborhoods with lower than average values are located in the east of Isfahan metropolis.
 
Conclusion
According to the results of the present study, about 33% of neighborhoods in the metropolis of Isfahan are in poor condition in terms of social indicators and more than 55% of neighborhoods in this city are average and unsuitable. Thus, the city is faced with a kind of social differentiation, social differentiation and duality, which eventually has manifests itself in the form of social polarization. In fact, social polarization has manifested itself spatially.
Thus, the city is faced with a kind of social differentiation, social differentiation and duality, which eventually manifests itself in the form of social polarization. In fact, social polarization has manifested itself spatially.In fact, social polarization has emerged as a geographical manifestation of social inequality and differentiation. It also means unbalanced and unbalanced distribution of a set of social indicators in the metropolis of Isfahan. So that, the results of spatial analysis have confirmed the inequality and social differentiation in the metropolis of Isfahan. In fact, the center and the northern part of Isfahan are in a favorable situation in terms of social indicators, and in contrast, the eastern neighborhoods are located in an unfavorable situation. The results of the present study are consistent with the background. According to the results of research by Lustig et al. (2013), Mukhopadhyay & Urzainqui  (2018) and Tarmizi et al. (2014), the existence of social inequality, spatial and social differentiation, geographical gap and social polarization has confirmed in Latin American cities, including Brazil, Approved in Argentina, Mexico and Asian cities such as India and Malaysia. Also, the results of the researches of Gholamipour and Kalantari (2017), Latifi and Babagoli (2015) and Safarloui et al. (2014) have confirmed the duality and spatial inequality in the cities of Mahshahr, Tehran and Urmia.
Keywords

Subjects


  1. Farid, Yadollah (2011). Geography and Urbanism. Eighth edition, Tabriz University Press: Tabriz. [Persian].
  2. Gholamipour, Esmail., & Kalantari, Abdolhossein.(2017). Formation of a Dual Society in Iranian Oil Cities with an Emphasis on the City of Mahshahr, The Socio-Cultural Research Journal of Rahbord: Volume 6, Number 25, pp. 107-139. [Persian].
  3. Koozegar, Hamid Reza., & estslaji, Alireza .(2020). Evaluation of managerial and physical-spatial changes of cities around the capital of Tehran (Case study: Ghods city), Geography International Quarterly of the Geographical Association of Iran: Volume 19, Number 1, pp.205- 218. [Persian].
  4. Latifi, Gholamreza., & Babagli, Mozhdeh .(2015). Investigating Unequal Urban Spaces in Tehran (1996-2011), Quarterly Journal of Urban and Regional Development Planning: Volume 1, Number 1, pp. 124-99. [Persian].
  5. Madanipour, Ali (2008). Urban Space Design: An Attitude Towards a Social-Spatial Process, Translated by Farhad Mortezaei, Third Edition. Publications of Urban Processing and Planning Company: Tehran. [Persian].
  6. Mahdenjad, Hafez., & Bayat, Mohammad .(2020). The Impact of Urban Poverty on Access to Urban Services Case Study: Shahriar City, Sustainable City Quarterly: Volume 3, Number 3, pp. 51-66. [Persian].
  7. Mahdenjad, Hafez., & Parhiz, Faryad .(2021). Determining the location of urban poverty zones (Case study: District 12 of Tehran metropolis), Human Geography Research: Volume 53, Number 2, pp. 307-321[Persian].
  8. Mahdenjad Hafez., Zanganeh, Ahmad., & Saeedi Rezvani, Navid. (2020). Analysis of the spatial overlap of poverty and worn texture in the suburbs of Tehran, Journal of Development of suburban spaces: Volume 2, Number 1, pp. 175-192[Persian].
  9. Maliki Sunki, Mahpasand., & Saraei, Mohammadhossein .(2019). An Analysis of Measuring the Relative Poverty Line in Chaharmahal Bakhtiari Province, Geography International Quarterly of the Geographical Association of Iran: Volume 18, Number 65, pp. 44-54. [Persian].
  10. Mousavi, Seyed Yaghoub., & Samadi, Ali (2018). Analysis of Social and Economic Inequality in Access to and Use of Public Urban Spaces (Case Study of Tehran), Quarterly Journal of Urban Sociological Studies: Volume 8, Number 26, pp. 1-33. [Persian].
  11. Nikpour, Amer., Malekshahi, Gholamreza., & Razzaqi, Fatireh .(2015). Spatial study and analysis of social inequalities in urban areas with a dense city approach studied: Babol, Quarterly Journal of Urban Studies: Volume 4, Number 16, pp. 27-38. [Persian].
  12. Pour Mohammadi, Mohammad Reza., Hekmatnia, Hassan., & Safarloui, Mohammad Ali .(2014). The Spatial Study and Analysis of Social Inequalities in Urban Zones of Uremia, Biannual Journal of Urban Ecological Researches: Volume 5, Number 9, pp. 57-70. [Persian].
  13. Saghaei, Mohsen., Moazeni, Ahmad., & Sanaei Rad, Amir .(2019). Evaluation of social housing and its effective factors in providing housing for low-income groups (Case study: Islamshahr), Geography International Quarterly of the Geographical Association of Iran: Volume 17, Number 63, pp. 179-195. [Persian].
  14. Short, John René. (2020). Urban Theory, Critical Evaluation, translated by Keramatollah Ziari, Hafez Mahdenjad and Faryad Parhiz, Third Edition, University of Tehran Press: Tehran. [Persian].
  15. Yousefi, Ali., & Warsaw, Somayeh .(2010). Social inequality in urban space of Mashhad: an estimate of income and education inequalities in urban areas, Iranian Journal of Social Studies, Volume 4, Number 4, pp. 1-28[Persian].
  16. Alkire, S., & Santos, M. E. (2010). Training Material for Producing National Human Development Reports, Construction & Analysis: MPI, 1-34.
  17. Andersen, H. S. (2002). Excluded places: The interaction between segregation, urban decay and deprived neighborhoods. Housing, Theory and Society: 19, No. 3-4, pp. 153–169.
  18. Andersen, H .T. (2004). Spatial-Not Social Polarization Social Change and Segregation in Copenhagen, the Greek Review of Social Research: Vol.113, No. 4, pp. 145-165.
  19. H., Ng, M. K., Lee, J., & Sze Mak, W. W. (2018). Socio-spatial polarization and the (re-)distribution of deprived groups in world cities: A case study of Hong Kong, Urban Geography: Vol.1, No. 1, pp. 1-64.
  20. Haizzan, Y. M., Firdaus, R. B. R., Samsurijan, M. S., Latiff, A. R. A., Singh, P. S. J., Jaafar, M. H. ,& Vadevelu, K. (2018). Urban Poverty and Housing: Social Work Issues. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences: 8, No. 9, pp. 1111–1118.
  21. Koç, A., Ata, A. Y., & Çirkin, Z. (2013). Empirical Investigation on Globalization and Social Polarization: Cross Country Analysis, International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues: 3, No.31, pp. 206-213.
  22. Lustig, N., Lopez-Calva, L. F., & Ortiz-Juarez, E. (2013). Declining inequality in Latin America in the 2000s: The cases of Argentina, Brazil, and Mexico. World Development, 44, No.3, pp. 129-141.
  23. Martínez‐Martín, J. A. (2007). Monitoring intra-urban inequalities with GIS-based indicators; with a case study in Rosario, Argentina, doctoral dissertation, Urban and Regional research centre Utrecht (URU), Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University.
  24. Motiram, S., & Sarma, N .(2011). Polarization, Inequality and Growth: The Indian Experience, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research: Mumbai, June 2011.
  25. Mukhopadhyay, A., & Urzainqui, D. G. (2018). The dynamics of spatial and local inequalities in India, WIDER Working Paper: 18, No.2, pp. 1-35.
  26. Musterd, S., Marcińczak, S., Van Ham, , & Tammaru, T .(2017). Socio-Economic Segregation in European Capital Cities: Increasing Separation between Poor and Rich, IZA Discussion Paper:  Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 1-26.
  27. Tarmizi,N. M., Shahriman, N., Ma’arof, I., & Samad, A. M. (2014). A Concept of Urban Poverty Area Identification Using Spatial Correlation Studies on High Resolution Satellite Imagery, FIG Congress 2014, and Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  28. Zwiers, M., Kleinhans, R., & Van Ham, M. (2015). Divided Cities: Increasing Socio-Spatial Polarization within Large Cities in the Netherlands, IZA Discussion Papers: 8, No.4, pp. 1-31.