Geography

Geography

Spatial and Temporal Assessment of the Accuracy of Precipitation Estimates from the ERA5-Land Reanalysis Database in Isfahan Province over the Past Two Decades

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
1 Ph.D. Student of Climatology, Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
2 Professor of Climatology, Department of Physical Geography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
10.22034/jiga.2025.2066496.1426
Abstract
Extended Abstract 
Introduction
According to various studies, precipitation has high volatility and greater uncertainty in forecasting than other atmospheric variables, especially temperature. Considering the special importance of precipitation in the life of living organisms, accurate data without statistical gaps must be available to further understand it. Since there are numerous limitations in the construction and maintenance of fixed ground stations, the need for appropriate databases from robust sources is greatly felt. One of these sources is reanalysis data, which can be used in calculations if their performance accuracy is evaluated.
 
Methodology
In the present study, after receiving the reanalysis data, due to its NC format, the precipitation data were converted to text format based on the coordinates of the research stations using R software. Due to the fact that the unit of measurement was meters for comparison under the same conditions, the precipitation data was converted to millimeters by multiplying the data by 1000. To evaluate the accuracy of the ERA5-Land reanalysis data, which have a much stronger horizontal resolution than the ERA5 type (horizontal resolution of approximately 31 km), the Taylor mathematical diagram was used. For this purpose, the reference for precipitation data was synoptic ground stations. Using the Taylor diagram, station precipitation data and reanalysis of all six stations were compared. The studies showed that the raw output of the reanalysis data does not have sufficient quality and accuracy in the study area due to its high bias. To reduce errors and optimize the data, bias correction was applied using the Quantile Mapping method. For each station, separated by monthly time scale, a Taylor diagram was drawn as the average precipitation over the 20-year study period. Then, for each month, separately for each station, the precipitation calculated by the two databases was compared using R software. The difference in average precipitation calculated by two ground stations and reanalysis was visually zoned with a geographic information system, and the amount of difference, overestimation, and underestimation of the ERA5-Land station was evaluated at each station.
 
Results and Discussion
According to the comparison between the precipitation data of the two ground stations and the reanalysis, the evaluation results with the Taylor diagram indicated a high error in the precipitation estimation by ERA5-Land in Isfahan province, so that the correlation coefficient value was zero in all months. Based on the Quantile Mapping method, bias correction optimized the precipitation data with very good performance, and the correlation coefficient reached 0.97 in some months. According to the graph drawn in the R software environment, the performance of the reanalysis database compared to the ground station in different months based on 6 stations in Isfahan province was consistent and had a low error. Zoning the difference in the average precipitation estimated by the reanalysis database with the synoptic station in the geographic information system software environment showed that the difference in precipitation between the two databases was appropriate and acceptable.
 
Conclusion
The results showed that the ERA5-Land precipitation data are not able to estimate the precipitation of the study area directly (raw), but after bias correction using the quantile mapping method, it made a very good estimate of the precipitation of Isfahan province with a maximum difference of 10 mm compared to the ground station data. The best performance of the ERA5-Land database is in the winter and autumn seasons. In terms of spatiality, the maximum and minimal differences of precipitation data between the two databases have been visible in the west and north of the study area, respectively. No specific spatial distribution was observed in terms of overestimation and underestimation.

 
Keywords

Subjects


1)       Aghamiri, H. S. & Rahmani, B. (2019). The Impact of Rural Migration on Food Security with Emphasis on Water Resources Case study: villages of Khansar city of Isfahan province. Geography, 16(59), 56-76. [Persian] https://mag.iga.ir/article_246083.html?lang=en
2)       Ahmadi, M. & Dadashi Rudbari, A. A. (2019). Monitoring Iran's monthly temperature trend based on the output of the European Medium Term Forecast Center. Geography, 17(60), 86-104. [Persian]
3)       ahmadi, M., nosrati, K. & solki, H. (2013). Drought and its relationship with soil moisture. Geography, 11(38), 77-92. [Persian]
4)       Azizimobaser, J., Rasoulzadeh, A., rahmati, A., shayeghi, A. & Bakhtar, A. (2021). Evaluating the Performance of Era-5 Re-Analysis Data in Estimating Daily and Monthly Precipitation, Case Study., Ardabil Province. Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 51(11), 2937-2951. [Persian]
5)       Bagheri, M., Mokhtari Hashi, H., Gandomkar, A. & khademolhoseiny, A. (2023). Identification and Ranking of the Factors Affecting the Water Crisis in Isfahan Province. Geography, 21(77), 13-29. [Persian]
6)       Bahrami, A. & Darand, M. (2025). Evaluation of spatio-temporal accuracy of precipitation estimation of ERA-5 database over Iran. Iranian Journal of Geophysics, 19(1), 27-46. [Persian]
7)       Dinku, T. (2019). Challenges with availability and quality of climate data in Africa. Extreme hydrology and climate variability, 71-80. Elsevier.
8)       Farokhnia, A., Anvari, S. & Najafi, M. S. (2024). Assessing the Accuracy of Satellite and Reanalysis Precipitation in Iran, Focusing on Datasets with High Spatial Resolution. Iran-Water Resources Research, 20(1), 68-89. [Persian]
9)       Gleixner, S., Demissie, T. & Diro, G. T. (2020). Did ERA5 Improve Temperature and Precipitation Reanalysis over East Africa? Atmosphere, 11(9), 996.
10)   Hamidianpour, M. & Shoja, F. (2022). Introduction to Methods and Techniques of Climate Modeling and Climate Change. First Edition. Sistan and Baluchestan: Sistan and Baluchestan University Press. [Persian]
11)   Hejazizadeh, Z. & Pagooh, F. (2022). Analyzing the relationship between synoptic patterns and the amount of pervasive pollutant suspended particles in Tehran province. Geography, 15(53), 21-36. [Persian], https://mag.iga.ir/article_254292.html
12)   Heidari, S., Karimi, M. & Beyranvand, A. (2024). Evaluation the performance of ERA5 reanalysis data in Iran's rainfall estimation and spatial analysis of the country's precipitation regime. Researches in Earth Sciences, 15(2), 1-24. [Persian]
13)   Jiao, D., Xu, N., Yang, F. & Xu, K. (2021). Evaluation of spatial-temporal variation performance of ERA5 precipitation data in China. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 17956.
 
14)   kazemiazar, F., Rezaie, H. & Mirabbasi, R. (2025). Performance evaluation of monthly ERA5 and ERA5-Land Reanalysis precipitation data in the upstream of the Zayandehroud reservoir basin. Iranian Journal of Irrigation & Drainage, 19(1), 75-87. [Persian] https://idj.iaid.ir/article_213824.html?lang=en 
15)   Lanzante, J. R., Adams‐Smith, D., Dixon, K. W., Nath, M. & Whitlock, C. E. (2020). Evaluation of some distributional downscaling methods as applied to daily maximum temperature with emphasis on extremes. International Journal of Climatology, 40(3), 1571-1585.
16)   Li, Q., Jiang, Y., Wei, L. & Zhu, J. (2025). Comparison of ERA5-Land and CMPAS reanalysis data for the regional assessment of precipitation in Chongqing, China. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 137(16), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-025-01062-2
17)   Majidi Karhroudi, F. S., Gharaylou, M. & Sabetghadam, S. S. (2024). Evaluation of the performance of the ERA5 and MERRA2 reanalysis datasets in estimating snow depth over Northwestern Iran. Journal of the Earth and Space Physics, 50(1), 251-263. [Persian]
18)   Malekzadeh, A., Ramesht, M. H. & Shahzidi, S. S. (2021). Normative analysis of precipitation characteristics and water resources of Iran in the texts of Iranian geographers (research article). Geography, 19(68), 38-50.  [Persian]
19)   Masoudian, S. A. (2012). The Climate of Iran, First Edition, Mashhad: Sharia Toos Publications. [Persian]
20)   Mohammadi, M. & Forozanfard, M. (2024). Evaluating ERA5 Reanalysis for Climate Trend Analysis in Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran. Climate Change Research, 5(19), 37-54. [Persian]
21)   Morales-Velázquez, M. I., Herrera, G. D. S., Aparicio, J., Rafieeinasab, A. & Lobato-Sánchez, R. (2021). Evaluating reanalysis and satellite-based precipitation at regional scale: A case study in southern Mexico. Atmósfera, 34(2), 189-206.
22)   Muñoz‑Sabater, J., Dutra, E., Agustí‑Panareda, A., Albergel, C., Arduini, G., Balsamo, G., Boussetta, S., Choulga, M., Harrigan, S., Hersbach, H., Martens, B., Miralles, D. G., Piles, M., Rodríguez‑Fernández, N. J., Zsoter, E., Buontempo, C. & Thépaut, J.‑N. (2021). ERA5‑Land: A state‑of‑the‑art global reanalysis dataset for land applications. Earth System Science Data, 13(9), 4349–4383.
23)   Nasr Isfahani, M. & Ghasemi, A. R. (2023). The Investigation of the Performance of Reanalyzed Global Forecast System (GFS (Data for Identifying evening thunderstorms in Iran. Journal of Natural Environmental Hazards, 12(37), 39-56.  [Persian] https://doi.org/10.22111/jneh.2023.42534.1906
24)   Nikandish, N. (2025). Analysis of spatial and temporal changes of extreme precipitation in Isfahan province. Geography and Development,  [Persian]
25)   Nuñez-Ibarra, D. A., Zambrano-Bigiarini, M. & Galleguillos, M. (2025). From grid to ground: How well do gridded products represent soil moisture dynamics in natural ecosystems during precipitation events? EGUsphere. Advance online preprint.
26)   Panofsky, H. A. & Brier, G. W. (1968). Some applications of statistics to meteorology, Pennsylvania State University.
1)Salahi, B. & Shahi, A. (2025). Assessment of Uncertainty of Reanalyzed Snow Depth in Northwestern Iran Using Era5-Land and Merra-2. Journal of Geography and Environmental Hazards, [Persian],  
28)   Seif, A. & Beranvand, H. (2024). ELA Reconstruction of late Quaternary in the Green Mountain in Zagros, Iran. Geography, 22(80), 151-171. [Persian]
 
29)   Tarek, M., Brissette, F. P. & Arsenault, R. (2020). Evaluation of the ERA5 reanalysis as a potential reference dataset for hydrological modelling over North America. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 24(5), 2527-2544.
30)   Taylor, K. E. (2001). Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram. Journal of geophysical research: atmospheres, 106(D7), 7183-7192. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900719
31)   Varlas, G., Stefanidis, K., Papaioannou, G., Panagopoulos, Y., Pytharoulis, I., Katsafados, P., Papadopoulos, A. & Dimitriou, E. (2022). Unravelling Precipitation Trends in Greece since 1950s Using ERA5 Climate Reanalysis Data. Climate, 10(2), 12.
32)   Yilmaz, M. (2023). Accuracy assessment of temperature trends from ERA5 and ERA5-Land. Science of the Total Environment, 856, 159182.‏