Geography

Geography

Evaluation of Urban Spaces for Children Based on Child-Friendly City Principles (Case Study: Ahvaz City)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
1 Assistant Professor, of Geography, Payame Noor University, Tehran. Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, of Geography, Payame Noor .University,Tehran, Iran
10.22034/jiga.2026.2060869.1408
Abstract
 

Extended Abstract
Introduction
Children, as a part of human society, shape the future generation of every country, and their interaction with the surrounding environment requires their physical and mental development. The United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) and the United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat) (2004) launched the Child-Friendly Cities Initiative to create environments that meet the physical, psychological, cognitive, social, and economic needs and rights of children. The Child-Friendly City initiative was designed to enable children to live in their preferred places, increase their participation in the city, and ensure their rights are not violated. Preparing urban spaces for children not only enhances their social responsibilities for urban life but also encourages them to respect and contribute to the preservation and maintenance of urban environments and spaces in the future (Ahmadvand et al., 1401: 63). Existing empirical evidence suggests that, despite significant efforts to establish child-friendly cities, few cities in Iran and even globally can claim to have achieved this goal. Given the population growth in the city of Ahvaz and its planning for social-economic and environmental development, concerns have arisen regarding children's well-being, child-friendly spaces, and safer living environments for children in this city. Therefore, examining public spaces to implement child-friendly principles and promote child-friendly development in Ahvaz is essential. Creating positive and healthy environments plays a crucial role in supporting the well-being and development of children in this city. Additionally, analyzing strategies for evaluating and optimizing child-friendly urban spaces in Ahvaz, targeting public services and infrastructure for children, is necessary.
The main objective of this research is to evaluate public urban spaces in the metropolis of Ahvaz based on child-friendly city indicators and to identify key factors influencing the creation of desirable public spaces for children. In this regard, two key questions have been raised: First, what is the status of regions, neighborhoods, and urban spaces in Ahvaz in terms of child-friendly indicators? Second, what are the key factors affecting the creation of child-friendly public spaces in the metropolis of Ahvaz?
 
Methodology
The present research is applied in terms of purpose, descriptive-analytical in terms of method and nature, and employs both quantitative and qualitative strategies as well as a case study approach. In the research process, mixed quantitative and qualitative methods (pragmatism) were used in the stages of data collection, analysis, and interpretation of results. Quantitative data were collected through secondary data, a researcher-designed questionnaire with open-ended questions, and interviews with experts. The statistical population consisted of experts, specialists, and urban managers in the metropolis of Ahvaz. Using non-probability purposive sampling and theoretical saturation, 30 experts were selected. For data collection, structured questionnaires and interviews were used based on the research models and objectives. To analyze the data and assess the status of regions, neighborhoods, and urban spaces in Ahvaz in terms of child-friendly indicators, Post Hoc tests and Tukey's HSD test were employed. To examine the key factors affecting the creation of child-friendly public spaces in the metropolis of Ahvaz, qualitative analysis was conducted using Grounded Theory with the MAXQDA software. For this purpose, after data collection, the interview content was coded through open, axial, and selective coding, and the key factors influencing child-friendly spaces were identified.
 
Results and Discussion
The status of regions, neighborhoods, and urban spaces in Ahvaz was evaluated based on child-friendly city indicators, categorized into three levels: undesirable, relatively desirable, and desirable. The findings indicate a significant difference in child-friendly indicators across the eight regions of Ahvaz. The analysis revealed the following regarding the status of Ahvaz's regions:
Regions 6, 7, and 8**: These regions were at an undesirable level in terms of child-friendly indicators. They performed poorly in aspects such as safety and security of spaces, children's access to spaces, green and open spaces, play and leisure areas, sustainability and maintenance of spaces, flexibility of spaces, and privacy.
Regions 3 and 5**: These regions were at a moderate level in terms of child-friendly city indicators, with children's access to these indicators being relatively desirable.
Regions 1, 2, and 4**: These regions were in a better condition compared to other regions in Ahvaz regarding child-friendly city indicators. They performed desirably in terms of safety and security of spaces, children's access to spaces, green and open spaces, play and leisure areas, sustainability and maintenance of spaces, flexibility of spaces, and privacy.
Table (2) presents the status of regions, neighborhoods, and urban spaces in Ahvaz based on child-friendly indicators, categorized into undesirable, moderate, and desirable levels.
 
Conclusion
The case study results regarding the key factors influencing the creation of child-friendly public spaces in the metropolis of Ahvaz revealed that the key factors include: safety and security of spaces designated for

 
children, universal access for children to spaces, availability of green and open spaces for children, provision of play and leisure areas for children, children's participation and engagement in the community, sustainability and maintenance of children's spaces, education and cultural awareness in society, flexibility of spaces, and children's privacy. Additionally, smaller-scale factors include safe design, traffic safety, adequate lighting, sense of security, safe equipment and spaces, easy access, location, walkability, connectivity network, suitable green spaces, diversity of green spaces, clean spaces and environments, natural spaces, appropriate play areas, diverse activities, leisure opportunities, family participation, children's engagement with local organizations, sense of public participation, social connectivity, high-quality and sustainable materials, maintenance planning, education for children and families, cultural awareness, knowledge dissemination, multi-purpose spaces, adaptability and development potential, and preservation of privacy and tranquility.
Therefore, to transform Ahvaz into a child-friendly city, in addition to implementing the factors identified in this research, collaboration among the municipality, non-governmental organizations, families, and children themselves is essential. This process requires long-term planning, resource allocation, and active participation of all stakeholders.
Keywords

Subjects


1)   
1)     Abedini,A. , Hosseinzadeh,R. and belali,M. (2024). Improving Child-Friendly urban spaces based on the right to the city model: the case study of Sardaran neighborhood of Urmia. Sustainable city7(3), 39-58. https://doi.org/10.22034/jsc.2024.455779.1777 [Persian]
2)     A bdolahi, A. A. and Azarnoosh, F. (2022). Evaluation of urban spaces for children based on the principles of a child-friendly city (Case study: Kerman). Journal of Urban Social Geography9(1), 77-96. https://doi.org/10.22103/JUSG.2022.2062 [Persian]
3)     Ahmadvand, M. , Soltani, Z. and goodarzi, M. (2022). Analyzing the child friendly city indicators in Ahvaz metropolis. Geographical Urban Planning Research (GUPR)10(3), 63-84. https://doi.org/10.22059/jurbangeo.2022.339123.1662 [Persian]
4)     Alami,R. , tavakolinia,J. and mohammadian mosammam,H. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Iranian Cities with Emphasis on Child-Friendly City The case of Tehran and Isfahan metropolises. Geographical planning of space quarterly journal13(4), 103-118.
5)     Barati,G. , Ahmadi,M. and Rahmati,F. (2021). Climatic pathology of pedestrian bridges in Tehran metropolis. Geography18(67), 70-81. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.27172996.1399.18.4.5.6 [Persian]
6)     Brown, C., de Lannoy, A., McCracken, D., Gill, T., Grant, M., Wright, H., & Williams, S. (2019).     Child-friendly cities. Cities & Health, 3(1-2), 1-7.
7)     Bruning, M. R., & Doek, J. E. (2021). Characteristics of an effective child protection system in the European and international contexts. International journal on child maltreatment: research, policy and practice, 4(3), 231-256.
8)     Canbulut, T., & Çakırca, S. İ. (2025). Social equality of children in the context of social and political participation with the capability approach. Cities, 158, 105-122.
 
9)     Cappa, C., & Petrowski, N. (2020). Thirty years after the adoption of the Convention on the Rights of the Child: Progress and challenges in building statistical evidence on violence against children. Child Abuse Negl, 110(Pt 1), 104- 118.
10)  Dongnan, F. U. (2021). Build a new standard system that serves children’s growth space-friendly. China Constr, 11, 22-25.
11)  Erzak, N. W., Tahir, M. I., & Hutasoit, I. (2025). Implementation of Special Protection Policy in Child-Friendly City Program in Banda Aceh City, Aceh Province. INFOKUM, 13(02), 210-226.
12)  Fan, J., Zheng, B., Liu, J., Tian, F., & Sun, Z. (2024). Research on child-friendly evaluation and optimization strategies for rural public spaces. Buildings, 14(9), 2948- 2959.
13)  Farokhi, S. , Jalilisadrabad, S. and Mofidi Shemirani, S. M. (2024). Assessing the environmental quality of child-friendly public spaces and pedestrian access to it;Sample studies of Kermanshah sahneh city. Journal of Urban Ecology Researches15(4), 41-60.  https://doi.org/10.30473/grup.2023.63432.2695 [Persian]
14)  Fasihi,H. and Parizadi,T. (2023). Comparative assessment of environmental quality of the inefficient fabrics of Tehran city (Case study: The neighborhoods of Region 3 in District 17 of Tehran Municipality). Geography21(79), 21-37. [Persian]
15)  Glos, A. (2025). Children's right to play in times of war. Bioethics, 39(1), 26-40.
16)  González-Carrasco, M. (2024). Child Friendly Cities. In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 752-755). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
17)  Hajizade,A. , Sarvar,R. and Farajirad,A. (2018). Analysis of the implementation process of Hamiyar Mozada City (Cfc) case study: Shiraz city. Geography15(55), 1-20. [Persian]
18)  Iran Statistics Center.(2015) Detailed Results of the General Population and Housing Census of 2015.Khouzestan Province 526-575
19)  Kamali, M. , Salehi Marzijrani, S. & Teimuri, M. (2024). explanation Feasibility of applying the child-friendly city approach in designing the open space of Mehr residential complex to improve the safety of children (Case study: Mehr Vahdat housing in Shiraz). Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design12(1), 151-166. doi: 10.22061/jsaud.2024.10637.2210. [Persian]
20)  Karamova, N., Khayrullayeva, N., Guliyeva, N., Ganbarli, U., Mustafazade, N., Aliyeva, S., & Mammadli, R. (2025). Comparative Study of Indicators of Mental Development of Primary School Children Living in Mountainous, Foothill and Coastal Areas. In BIO Web of Conferences (Vol. 151, p. 04015). EDP Sciences.
21)  Karbalaei Hosseini Ghiyasvand, A.& Soheyli, J. (2014). Lovely city investigated the characteristics of children looked (Case study: the two municipal district of Qazvin). Motaleate Shahri3(9), 59-68. [Persian]
22)  kiani,A. & esmaeel zade kovaki,A. (2012). Analysis and Planning "Child-Friendly City" (CFC) from the perspective of children (Case study: Quchan). The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar9(20), 51-62. [Persian]
23)  Lu, P., & van Ameijde, J. (2025). The impact of high-density urban environments on children’s play, a systematic review of current insights. Cities & Health, 1-20.
24)  Mehdizadeh,N. , Ghorbanian,G. , Borna,R. , Morshedi,J. and Nilshz,H. (2025). Developing a model of a low- carbon cities in order to reduce climate change and sustainable development (a case study of Ahvaz metropolis). Geography22(83), 123-141. https://doi.org/10.22034/iga.2024.2043983.1339 [Persian]
25)  Moghani Rahimi,B. (2021). Healthy city planning with sustainable development approach (four regions of Kerman). Geography18(67), 131-141. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.27172996.1399.18.4.10.1 [Persian]
26)  O’Connor, D., Lynch, H., & Boyle, B. (2021). A qualitative study of child participation in decision-making: Exploring rights-based approaches in pediatric occupational therapy. Plos one, 16(12), 975- 988.
27)  Ortigoza, A., Alazraqui, M., Braverman-Bronstein, A., Caiaffa, W. T., Cartagena, D., Crespo, G., & Vert, C. (2023). Why do we need an urban health agenda that prioritizes children and adolescents in Latin America?. Cities & health, 7(1), 71-80.
 
28)  Payà Rico, A., & Bantulà Janot, J. (2021). Children’s right to play and its implementation: A comparative, international perspective. Journal of new approaches in educational research, 10(2), 279-294.
29)  Powell, R. (2024). Child-Friendly Cities and Communities: opportunities and challenges. Children's Geographies, 25(10), 1-14.
30)  Rakhimova, N., McAslan, D., & Pijawka, D. (2022). Measuring child-friendly cities: developing and piloting an indicator assessment tool for sustainable neighborhood planning. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, 1-27.
31)  Saberifar, R. (2023). Analysis of Influential Factors in Design Elements of Child-Friendly Urban Spaces by Using Children's Drawings (Case Study: Parks and Playgrounds in Mashhad). Geography and Territorial Spatial Arrangement, 13(47), 183-214. https://doi.org/10.22111/gaij.2023.45759.3119 [Persian]
32)  Sapsağlam, Ö., & Eryılmaz, A. (2024). Building Child-Friendly Cities for Sustainable Child Development: Child-Friendly City Scale-Child Form. Sustainability, 16(3), 1228
33)  . Shahipour,S. , Tavaklan,A. and Sarver,R. (2020). Analyzing the Relationship between Urban Space Justice through Urban Adaptation Strategies and the Welfare of the Elderly in Different Urban Spaces (Case Study: Tehran Region 3). Geography17(63), 76-91. [Persian]
34)  Vafadari Komarolya,D. , Nazmfar,H. , Hami,A. and Yazdani,M. H. (2024). Identifying of the aesthetic indicators of the urban landscape. Geography22(82), 149-164. https://doi.org/10.22034/iga.2024.2036141.1318 [Persian]
35)  Veisia, E. , Hosseini Siahgoli, M. and Damanbagh, S. (2024). A Study of Indicators of a Child-Friendly City with Emphasis on Children's Sports Facilities (Case study: Ahvaz). Journal of Geography and Regional Development22(3), 361-389. https://doi.org/10.22067/jgrd.2024.89468.1464  [Persian]
36)  Wilhelmsen, T., Øvreås, S., Roll-Hansen, H., Bjerknes, A.-L., & Thorrud, S. (2023). Developing child-friendly cities: Young children’s participation in urban planning. Journal of Childhood, Education & Society, 4(3), 274–290.
37)  Yang, Y., Wang, Q., Wu, D., Hang, T., Ding, H., Wu, Y., & Liu, Q. (2024). Constructing child-friendly cities: Comprehensive evaluation of street-level child-friendliness using the method of empathy-based stories, street view images, and deep learning. Cities, 154, 105-115.
38)  Yoo, D. U., Lee, S., & Park, S. H. (2021). A study on international comparison and improvement measures for child-friendly city indicators for improving spatial welfare of children. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 37(10), 137-147.