Geography

Geography

Evaluating changes in the water level of Zarivar Lake in 30 years (1993-2023)

Document Type : Research Article

Author
Department of Geography, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran.
Abstract
Extended Abstract
Introduction
The coastline is defined as the contact line between the land and the lake. Any fluctuation in the lake level creates significant changes in the beach. Extreme changes in the status of different wetlands in the world have occurred mainly through the expansion of urbanization and the growth of agriculture. Changes in the coastline are supposedly essential in environmental management. This is important in coastal erosion monitoring, flood forecasting, and water resources assessment. Remote sensing images are the most reliable type of information data in the world. Various satellite sensors have been placed in Earth’s orbit since 1960 to monitor the Earth's surface. Regular monitoring of lakes can provide a basis for understanding human impacts and managing the lake more efficiently. Nowadays, remote sensing and geographic information systems have presented new methods for ecosystem management. These systems allow the development of an automated system for extracting specific elements such as coastlines. GIS system is a useful tool in spatial analysis, accurate description of spatial correlations, and providing effective outputs. Remote sensing systems have been widely used to analyze and evaluate images in different intervals and have made it possible to examine beaches by comparing old and new images. Researchers so far have used no learning algorithm to check the changes in the coastline and the level of Zarivar Lake. This research uses the maximum probability model (MLC) and support vector machine (SVM) to evaluate the change in the coastlin e and water level of Zarivar Lake.
 
Methodology
At first, 3 Landsat 5 and 8 satellite images were selected for Zarivar Lake in the periods of May 1993, 2010, and 2023. The amount of rainfall reaches its peak in May. Therefore, the processing is done in the best conditions so that the maximum rate of expansion and retreat of the lake water level can be obtained in 30 years. The specifications of the images should be free of cloud cover to assess shoreline changes over time. Satellite images depict the state of Zarivar Lake from 1993 to 2023. The 1993 TM sensor map of the Landsat 5 satellite was supposedly a base map to obtain and compare the amount of changes in the years under study. This research uses a multivariate spatial analysis tool. At first, the lake water level was obtained for all three images through the maximum probability method. The support vector machine technique was also used to classify the area under study and gain the amount of surface reduction. The extracted vector layers determined the regression of the lake since 1993. This research used the Kappa coefficient to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of each model and calculated its values ​​ for each of the desired years. It estimated, as the last step, the correlation between the NWI and WRI spectral indices and the bands used in their preparation and drew a scatter diagram to determine the relationship between the spectral indices.
Results and Discussion
The water level of the lake in 1993 is supposedly a basis for evaluating the amount of regression. The total area of ​​the lake according to the MLC model in 1993 was equal to 5.4 square kilometers. The surface area of ​​the lake in 2010 was approximately 8.28 square kilometers, which has increased by 52.7% compared to 1993. The area of ​​surface water reached 21.6 square kilometers in 2023, which has decreased by 25% compared to 2010. The maximum retreat occurred in the southern part of the lake, and a significant deformation was observed in the western part of the lake. Both methods have shown similar results. NWI and WRI spectral indices besides MLC and SVM algorithms were also used to investigate changes in the water’s broad stretch of Zarivar Lake. The above indices correctly separate the blue broad stretches from other ones, but it is necessary to reclassify the above maps to gain the area of ​​the blue broad stretches. As the classified map shows, it is possible to estimate the area of ​​Zarivar Lake in spectral indices. The area of ​​the lake has increased from 8.28 square kilometers to 9.26
 
square kilometers and has increased by 11.8 percent according to the NWI spectral index. The area of ​​the lake in the WRI index has increased from 2.8 square kilometers to 9.06 square kilometers, showing an increase of 10.48%. This shows that the lake level has increased in both indices and the resulting values ​​are very close to each other and only differ by 1.32%. A correlation diagram was established between indicators and the spectral bands used in their preparation to investigate their correlation. The results show that the Pearson correlation coefficient between the two spectral indices NWI and WRI is equal to 0.97 percent and the R2 coefficient is equal to 0.95.
Conclusion
New techniques based on learning algorithms and spectral indices make it possible to investigate the changes of water broad stretches in intervals of two years. Free satellite images such as Landsat 5 and 8 enable long-term observations. Different spectral bands can show the reflective behavior of water and help to identify them. Likewise, the changes in water broad stretches in semi-arid land like Iran are of great importance. Thus, changes in the water area of Zarivar Lake were investigated in the period 1993-2023. The area under study was divided into three water broad stretches, agricultural lands, and barren lands, through the SVM and MLC algorithms. It showed that the water broad stretch in the SVM model for the years 1993, 2010, and 2023 is equivalent to 8.62, and 10.13, respectively and it was 12.75 square kilometers. The above values in the MLC model are equivalent to 5.42, 8.28, and 6.21. Both models showed an increase in the lake level, but the obtained values had significant differences. For example, the changes in 2023 showed different values for both models. The results of the Kappa coefficient for the SVM model were equal to 0.94 in 2023.
Keywords

Subjects


  1. Abbas, Z. & Jaber, H.S. (2020). Accuracy assessment of supervised classification methods for extraction land use maps using remote sensing and GIS techniques. IOP Conf. Series: Mater. Sci. Eng, 745(1), 121-126. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/745/1/012166
  2. Abdoli, M. & Haghighi, M. (2021). Comparison of support vector machine and artificial neural network classification methods to produce landuse maps (Case study: Bojagh National Park), Journal of Environmental Research and Technology, 8(5), 47-60. [persian].
  3. Abedi, M., Norouzi, G. & Bahroudi, A. (2012). Support Vector machine for multi classification of mineral prospectivity areas, computers and Geosciences,46(2), 272-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.12.014
  4. Afifi, M. (2021). Investigation of the Effect of Drought on Vegetation Using Remote Sensing Techniques, Case Study of Dorodzan Dam Catchment, Journal of Geography, 19(70), 153-172. [persian].
  5. Al-Abudi, B. Q. & Kouder, N. Z. (2016). Change Detection Study for Al Razaza Lake and The Surrounding Area, GIS & Geospatial Technologies Conference, Special Issue, December 2016, 180-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2022.01.013
  6. Al-Azzawi, T.M.F. (2019). Integration approach of remote sensing and GIS to detect land use/land cover change dynamics in himreen lake and surrounding area. Al- Adab J,130(3),111–130. https://doi.org/10.31973/aj.v1i130.646
  7. Blaschke, T. (2010). Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens, 65(1), 2-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.06.004
  8. Boser, B., Guyon, I. & Vapnik, V. (1992). A training algorithm fotoptimal margin classifier, in: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Conference on Computational Learning Theory, Pittsburgh, 8(2), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1145/130385.130401
  9. Campvalls, G., Mooij, J. & Scholkopf, B. (2010). Remote sensing feature selection by Kernel dependence measures. IEEE Geoscience and remote sensing Letters, 7(4), 587- 591. https://doi.org/1109/LGRS.2010.2041896
  10. Chen, J., Chen, J., Liao, A., Cao, X., Chen, L., Chen, X., He, C., Han, G., Peng, S., Lu, M., Zhang, W., Tong, X. & Mills, J. (2015). Global land cover mapping at 30 m resolution: a POK-based operational approach. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens, 103(2), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.09.002
  11. Cristianini, N. & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2000). An Introduction to SupportVector Machines and Other Kernelbased Learning Methods,Cambridge University Press, 2000,
    Dellepiane, S., De Laurentiis, R. & Giordano, F. (2004). Coastline extraction from SAR images and a method for the evaluation of the coastline precision. Pattern Recogn. Lett, 25(13), 1461–1470. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801389
  12. Ding, J., Cuo, L., Zhang, Y. & Zhu, F. (2018). Monthly and annual temperature extremes and their changes on the Tibetan Plateau and its surroundings during 1963– 2015. Sci. Rep,24(5), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30320-0
  13. El-Asmar, H.M., Hereher, M.E. & El Kafrawy, S.B. (2013). Surface area change detection of the Burullus Lagoon, North of the Nile Delta, Egypt, using water indices: a remote sensing approach. Egypt. J. Remote Sensing Space Sci, 16(1), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2013.04.004
  14. Elsahabi, M., Negmb, A. & Ali, K. (2016). Performances evaluation of water body extraction techniques using Landsat ETM+ data: case-study of Lake Nubia, Sudan. Egypt. J. Eng. Sci. Technol., 19 (EIJEST, 19(2), 275–281. https://doi.org/21608/EIJEST.2016.97140
  15. Foody, G. & Mathur, A. (2006). The use of small training sets containing mixed pixels for accurate hard image classification: training onmixed spectral responses for classification by a SVM, RemoteSens. Environ, 103(4), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160600962566
  16. Foody, G., Boyd, D. & Sanchez-Hernandez, C. (2007). Mapping a specific class with an ensemble of classifiers, Int. J. Remote Sens, 28(2), 1733–1746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.04.001
  17. Geo, Y., De Jong, K., Liu, F. & Wang, X., Li, C. (2012). A comparison of Artificial neural networks and support vector machines on landcover classification, Springer verlag Berlin Heidelberg, ISICA, CCIS, 316(6), 531- 539. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2011.568531
  18. Granian, H., Tabatabaei, S., Asadi, H. & Carranza, E. (2016). Application of Discriminant Analysis support vector machine Gold Potential areas for further Drilling in the Sari Gunay Gold Deposit, NW Iran, natural Resource Research,25(2), 145-159. https://doi.org/1007/s11053-015-9271-2
  19. Hejazizadeh, Z., Pajooh, F. & Shakiba, H. (2021). Analyzing the accuracy of drought indicators and determining the best climatic indicators in southeastern Iran, Journal of Geography, 19(68), 5-21. [persian].
  20. Huange, C., Davis, L.S. & Townshend, J. (2002). An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classification. International Journal of Remote sensing, 23(4), 725- 749.
  21. Jahanbakhshi, F. & Ekhtesasi, M. (2019). Performance Evaluation of Three Image Classification Methods (Random Forest, Support Vector Machine and the Maximum Likelihood) in Land Use Mapping, Journal of Water and Soil Science, 22(4), 235-247. [persian].
  22. Jensen, J.R. (2005). Introductory Digital image processing a Remote sensing Perspective, 3rd Edition, Upper saddle River, Prentice Hall. 526. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106048709354084
  23. Ma, L., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Ye, Y., Yin, G. & Johnson, B.A. (2019). Deep learning in remote sensing applications: a meta-analysis and review. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens, 152(7), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.04.015
  24. Mountrakis, G., Im, J. & Ogole, C. (2011). Support vector machine in remote sensing a review. ISPRS Journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing, 13(2), 247- 259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.11.001
  25. Muhsin, I.J., Kaittan, M.Q. & Ali, H.I. (1985). Monitoring of the changes in water rate for Al-razaza lake using remote sensing techniques. Methods, 24(4), 120-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2022.01.013
  26. Najafi, A., Azizi, S. & Mokhtari, M. (2017). Assessment Kernel Support Vector Machines in Classification of Landuses (Case Study: Basin of Cheshmeh kileh-Chalkrod), Journal of Watershed Management Research, 8(15), 92-101. [persian]
  27. Rasuly, A., Naghdifar, R. & Rasoli, M. (2010). Monitoring of Caspian Sea coastline changes using object-oriented techniques. Procedia Environ. Sci, 2(5), 416–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2010.10.046
  28. Shanani Hoveyzeh, M. & Zarei, H. (2016). Comparison of Three Classification Algorithms (ANN, SVM and Maximum Likelihood) for Preparing Land Use Map (Case Study: Abolabbas Basin), Journal of Watershed Management Science, 10(33), 73-84. [persian].
  29. Shen, L. & Li, C. (2010). Water body extraction from Landsat ETM+ imagery using adaboost algorithm. In: 18th International Conference on Geoinformatics. IEEE, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/GEOINFORMATICS.2010.5567762
  30. Yousefi, H., Torabi Podeh, H., Haghizadeh, A., Samadi, A., Arshiya, A. & Yarahmadi, Y. (2022). Monitoring the Changes of Zaribar Lake in Kurdistan Using Spectral Indicators and Landsat Images in Google Earth Engine System, Hydrogeology, 6(2), 30-41. [persian]
  31. Yousefiroshan, M. (2022). Estimation of lake Urmia water area using Landsat 8 satellite imagery using MNDWI Index, Journal of Geography, 20(74), 165-186. [persian].
  32. Zhang, X., Pan, D., Chen, J., Zhao, J., Zhu, Q. & Huang, H. (2014). Evaluation of coastline changes under human intervention using multi-temporal high-resolution images: a case study of the Zhoushan Islands, China. Remote Sensing, 6(10), 9930–9950. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6109930