Geography

Geography

Assessment of Vulnerability of Rural Settlements to Natural Hazards with Emphasis on Earthquakes (Case Study: Villages of Khonj County)

Document Type : Research Article

Authors
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, Payam Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of Geography Education, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Extended Abstract
Introduction
With the intensification of global climate change and geophysical movements since the beginning of the twenty-first century, earthquakes, tsunamis, landslides, and other natural disasters have occurred repeatedly, profoundly impacting global economic and social development. Among these disasters, earthquakes are the most devastating, and therefore, disaster risk management for earthquakes has become a hot topic in academic and political forums. Earthquakes are considered one of the most significant natural disasters, causing numerous natural and human problems upon their occurrence. Iran is among the ten earthquake-prone countries globally due to its geographical and geological location. When an earthquake disaster occurs, it leaves significant destruction in rural areas in terms of environmental, social, and economic dimensions. Therefore, it is essential to take action to reduce the adverse effects of natural hazards in these areas by adopting sustainable rural development based on risk management, devising and implementing appropriate methods.
 
Methodology
This research is descriptive-analytical and focuses on rural areas in Khonj County. The data collection methods used in this research are library and field studies, where the current situation was examined in the field, and collected information was adapted to the study environment. The research begins with a review of previous studies on rural settlements and natural hazards, including earthquakes. The sources from which data were collected include existing library resources, Landsat 8 satellite images, topographic and geological maps, and meteorological data. To identify earthquake-vulnerable rural areas, maps of faults, earthquakes, elevation, river networks, distance from rivers, slope maps, precipitation and temperature maps, and geological maps were prepared. Then, using Geographic Information System (GIS), each layer was assessed, and the final map resulting from the overlap of all factors was obtained.
 
Results and Discussion
The minimum altitude in Khonj County is 229 meters above sea level, and the maximum altitude is 1746 meters above sea level, which corresponds to the heights present in the county. The study area does not have uniformity in altitude, and the settlements in this county are mainly located at its average altitudes. Most of the villages in Khonj County are situated on southwest slopes, with 17 villages, representing 0/021 of the total settlements. This slope has been more attractive for settlements. While the southern and southwestern slopes encompass most of the spaces in this region. Out of 64 urban and rural settlements in the study area, 35 (0/030/46) settlements are located on the Gachsaran formation. Most parts of Khonj County are exposed to severe erosion, indicating a severe need for erosion control measures. Two villages are located at the highest risk distance from faults. These villages, Qasemabad and Talmeh, should consider relocating their settlements to safer areas away from the fault lines. Five other villages are located within 200-400 meters of faults, necessitating a reconsideration of their resettlement plans. However, it's evident from the study of Kangan County villages that nearly 0/060 of these villages are located at a reasonable distance from fault lines, which serves as a positive aspect of the settlements in this county.
 
Conclusion
Based on the final map obtained by combining all the maps, rural areas exposed to severe earthquake hazards include 14 villages. These 14 villages are mostly located in the eastern part of Mahmaleh and Baghan districts. Villages located in areas with lower risks are the second group, facing lesser risks compared to villages in high-risk areas. A total of 15 villages are situated in these areas, scattered around high-risk rural areas and distributed across all four districts of the county. The rest of the county areas indicate the locations of settlements where earthquake risks are not evident, with 45 villages settled in these areas, representing the highest number of settlements according to the map.
Keywords

Subjects


  1. Ahadnezhad-Roushti, M. Jalili, K. & Zolfi, A (2011). Optimal Location Selection for Temporary Shelters for Earthquake Victims in Urban Areas Using Multi-Criteria and GIS Methods (Case Study: Zanjan City). Applied Research in Geographic Sciences (Geographic Sciences), 20(23), 45-61. [Persian] http://jgs.khu.ac.ir/article-1-636-fa.html
  2. Abbaspour, N (2016). Examination of the Urban Structure of Bastak with Emphasis on Earthquake Phenomenon. Master’s Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Larestan. [Persian]
  3. Ao, Y. Zhang, H. Yang, L. et al (2021). Impacts of earthquake knowledge and risk perception on earthquake preparedness of rural residents. Nat Hazards 107,1287–1310(2021). http://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04632-w
  4. Ao, Y. Huang, K. Wang, Y. Wang, Q. & Martek, I (2020). Influence of built environment and risk perception on seismic evacuation behavior: Evidence from rural areas affected by Wenchuan earthquake. International journal of disaster risk reduction, 46,101504. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101504
  5. Faraji Sabkbar, H. Tahmasbi, B. Ghorbani, M. Sarmadi Sifi, A. A. & Soltani Ghiathvand, N (2021). Assessment of Vulnerability of Rural Settlements in Iran Against Earthquake Risk. Housing and Rural Environment, 40(174), 103-118. [Persian]. http://dx.doi.org/DOI:%2010.22034/40.174.103
  6. Freddi, F. Galasso, C. Cremen, G. Dall’Asta, A. Di Sarno, L. Giaralis, A. & Woo, G (2021). Innovations in earthquake risk reduction for resilience: Recent advances and challenges. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 60, 102267. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102267
  7. Ghazanfari, A (2016). Geomorphology and Its Role in Managing Natural Disasters in Lamerd City with an Emphasis on Earthquakes Using GIS. Master’s Thesis, Islamic Azad University, Larestan. [Persian]
  8. Qanawati, Ezzatullah, Sheikhi, Massoud (2010). The role of urban planning in reducing the risk of earthquakes in worn-out structures, a case study: District 12 of Tehran, Journal of Natural Geography, 3(9), 29-42. [Persian]. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/261679
  9. Hosseini, M (2016). Historical Geography of Earthquakes in Iran: Seismic Documents from the Beginning to the Safavid Era. Geography (Scientific Quarterly of the Iranian Geographical Association), 14(49), 433-453. [Persian]. https://mag.iga.ir/article_707176.html
  10. Imani, B. Hoseini Amini, H. & Talebi, R (2019). Location Selection of Rural Crisis Management Centers (Case Study: Ardabil County). Geography (Scientific Quarterly of the Iranian Geographical Association), 17(61), 71-90. [Persian]. https://mag.iga.ir/article_247513.html
  11. Izquierdo-Horna, L. & Kahhat, R (2020). An interdisciplinary approach to identify zones vulnerable to earthquakes. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 48,101592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101592
  12. Karam, A. & Mihanparast, A (2020). Geo-Environmental Land Suitability Assessment for Urban Land Use Planning (Case Study: District 22, Tehran). Geography (Scientific Quarterly of the Iranian Geographical Association), 18(64), 51-63. [Persian]. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/261679
  13. Khakpour, B. Zamordian, M. & Moghadami, A (2011). Analysis of the Physical Vulnerability of District 9 of Mashhad City. Geography and Regional Development,9(16),16-34. [Persian]. https://jgrd.um.ac.ir/article_27690.html
  14. Khaledi, S. Farahmand, A. & Alibakshi, A (2022). Analysis and Zoning of Vulnerability to Natural Hazards (Floods and Earthquakes) in Kermanshah Province. Sustainable Urban and Regional Development Studies, 2(1), 17-36. [Persian]. https://www.srds.ir/article_132471.html
  15. Khoda Panah, K (2023). Assessment and Analysis of Economic and Social Vulnerability of Rural Settlements Against Earthquakes (Case Study: Central District of Ardabil County). New Approaches in Human Geography,14(3),145-162. [Persian].https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.66972251.1401.14.3.7.7
  16. Lian, P. Zhuo, Z. Qi, Y. Xu, D. & Deng, X (2021). The impacts of training on farmers’ preparedness behaviors of earthquake disaster evidence from earthquake-prone settlements in rural China. Agriculture, 11(8), 726. http://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11080726
  17. Naderi, F. Fotouhi, S. Negarash, H. & Khalili, M (2021). Prioritization of Earthquake Risk in Areas Affected by the Sarpol-e Zahab Earthquake Using the ELECTRE Model. Geography, 19(70), 21-41. [Persian]. https://dorl.net/dor/http://dor.net/dor/20.1001.1.27172996.1400.19.70.2.2
  18. Olson, D. L. & Wu, D. D (2010). Earthquakes and risk management in China. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 16(3), 478-493. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807031003779898
  19. Parishan, M (2011). Risk Management of Natural Hazards with a Focus on Earthquake Risk in Rural Areas of Qazvin Province. Ph.D. Dissertation, Faculty of Humanities, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran. [Persian]
  20. Pour Taheri, Mehdi; Sejasi Khedari, Hamdollah and Sadeghlou, Tahereh (2011). Evaluation of natural hazard rating methods in rural areas (case study: Zanjan province), Rural Research, 2(7), 31-54 [Persian]. http://jrur.ut.ac.ir/article_23686.html
  21. Pour Taheri, Mehdi; Hajinejad, Ali, Fatahi, Ahadollah and Nemati, Reza (2013). Assessing the physical vulnerability of rural settlements against natural hazards (earthquakes) using the Kopras decision-making model (a case study of the villages of Chalan-Cholan village in Drood city), Amash Space and Geomatics Journal, 18(3),29-52. [Persian]. https://hsmsp.modares.ac.ir/article-21-303-fa.html
  22. Rashed, T. & Weeks, J (2003). Assessing vulnerability to earthquake hazards through spatial multicriteria analysis of urban areas. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 17(6), 547-576. http://doi.org/1080/136588103100011.4071
  23. Riahi, V. & Maghdesi, Y (2023). Analysis of the Vulnerability of Villages in Eshtehard County to Earthquakes. Journal of Geography and Development, 181-206. Http://doi.org/10.22111/gdij.2023.7404. [Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22111/gdij.2023.7404
  24. Sadough, H (2016). Applied Physical Geography, Natural Disasters. Geography (Scientific Quarterly of the Iranian Geographical Association), 14(48), 113-127. [Persian]. https://mag.iga.ir/article_701094.html
  25. Saeedi, A. & Imani, B (2014). The Role of Internal and External Forces in the Transformation of the Spatial-Physical Structure of Rural Settlements Around Ardabil City. Geography, 12(40),7-28. [Persian]. https://mag.iga.ir/article_701408.html
  26. Shakiba, M. Makan, M. & Seif, M (2020). Measuring and Prioritizing the Vulnerability of Rural Settlements to Earthquakes Using Fuzzy Logic in GIS (Case Study: Fars Province). Earth Science Research, 9(4), 181-200. [Persian]. https://doi.org/10/29252/esrj.9/4/181
  27. Shiee, E. Habibi, K. & Torabi, K (2010). Investigating the Vulnerability of Urban Communication Networks to Earthquakes Using the IHWP and GIS Method (Case Study: District Six, Tehran Municipality). Bagh-e Nazar, 7(13), 35-48. [Persian]. https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_24.html
  28. Wenzel,F (2006). Earthquake risk reduction–obstacles and opportunities. European Review, 14(2),221-231. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1062798706000214
  29. Xu, D. Yong, Z. Deng, X. Liu, Y. Huang, K. Zhou, W. & Ma, Z (2019). Financial preparation, disaster experience, and disaster risk perception of rural households in earthquake-stricken areas: evidence from the Wenchuan and Lushan earthquakes in China’s Sichuan Province. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(18), 3345 http://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16183345