جغرافیا  (نشریۀ انجمن جغرافیایی ایران)

جغرافیا (نشریۀ انجمن جغرافیایی ایران)

بینش ژئواکونومیک و راهبرد دریاگرایی: توصیه‌ هایی برای توسعه ایران

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسنده
دانشیار جغرافیای سیاسی دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران.
10.22034/jiga.2025.2060049.1401
چکیده
سرزمین پهناور ایران از موقعیت منحصر به فرد جغرافیایی و ژئوپلیتیکی برخوردار است. ویژگی موقعیت نسبی کشور ایران به گونه‌ ای است که در اوراسیا در موقعیت دریایی و اقیانوسی، موقعیت کانونی و دسترسی مستقیم به مناطق ژئوپلیتیک پیرامونی و به طور کلی در موقعیت لولایی قرار دارد. با این وجود، ایران نتوانسته است در دنیای جدید از ظرفیت‌ ها و مزیت‌ های فوق العاده‌ ی خود در راستای توسعه و منافع ملی و افزایش تولید قدرت و ثروت استفاده کند. هدف پژوهش حاضر، ارائه بینش و راهبرد مناسب برای بهره‌ گیری از ظرفیت‌ ها و مزیت‌ های ایران در مناسبات جدید منطقه‌ ای و جهانی در جهت توسعه و افزایش قدرت و منزلت ایران است. این پژوهش به روش توصیفی و تحلیلی و با استفاده از داده های کتابخانه ای انجام شده است. کوشش شده است ابتدا دیدگاه‌ های نظری و بنیان‌ های اندیشه‌ ای موضوع تبیین گردد و سپس نگرش و بینش راهبردی ژئواکونومیک و مکمل آن دریاگرایی با نگاه به آینده برای پیشرفت و توسعه ایران تبیین و ضرورت انتخاب و بهره‌گیری از آن ارائه گردد. نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌ دهد که ایران برای فعال‌ سازی ظرفیت‌ ها و مزیت‌ های جغرافیایی و سرزمینی خود نیازمند بینش ژئواکونومیک و راهبرد دریاگرایی است. ایران در پرتو بینش ژئواکونومیک می‌ تواند در فرایند های توسعه منطقه‌ ای و فضای جریان‌ ها قرار گیرد. با اتخاذ بینش ژئواکونومیک و راهبرد دریاگرایی، سرزمین ایران در مسیر کریدورهای اقتصادی اوراسیا قرار می‌ گیرد و بنادر و مناطق ساحلی و به ویژه منطقه مکران پیشران توسعه ایران خواهد شد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Geo-economic insight and maritime strategy: recommendations for Iran's development

نویسنده English

Hadi Veicy
Associate Professor of Political Geography, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
Introduction
The vast territory of Iran has a unique geographical and geopolitical position. The characteristic of Iran's relative position is that it is located in the maritime and oceanic position, the axis position and direct access to the surrounding geopolitical regions, and in general, it is in a hinge position. Nevertheless, Iran has not been able to use the extraordinary capacities and advantages of its position in the new world. Iran has not been able to benefit from its good position in line with the development and national interests and increasing the production of its power and wealth. The aim of this research is to provide insight and a suitable strategy for taking advantage of Iran's capacities and advantages in new regional and global relations in order to develop and increase Iran's power and dignity.
Despite Iran's great territorial location, Iran has not only been unable to take the initiative in designing and creating joint regional economic projects, but has also been eliminated by competitors in many regional projects (regional corridors and international regional oil and gas pipelines). Ignoring Iran's territory and excluding Iran from regional projects is a very important problem that requires careful consideration.
Methodology
The current research is applied in terms of its nature and has been carried out in a descriptive and analytical method. The data required for the research has been collected by the library method and through note taking collection. It has been tried to use reliable sources and new and documented scientific articles and theories of experts related to the subject. The researcher has tried to first explain the conceptual foundations and theoretical views of the subject, then to criticize the geopolitical discourse and the current situation of the Islamic Republic of Iran with a geo-economic perspective and insight. It has also been tried to explain the geo-economic strategic vision and its complement of maritime orientation with a view to the future for the progress and development of Iran and the necessity of choosing and using it.
Result and discussion
Strategy is the best attitude and vision and a practical macro plan among different approaches and perspectives to achieve the desired goals. Strategy is a key and central issue in governance and statecraft. In state affairs, macro strategies largely determine the direction, planning system and future direction of each country.
In the new world, countries have been the pioneers of growth and development that have defined their national macro strategies based on economic motivations. In terms of nature, geo-economics is a kind of macro strategy and practical insight to secure and defend national interests.
In the new age, economy and economic factors are the basis of decision-making and power relations. Foreign policy of countries cannot be sustainable and successful without economic considerations and giving priority to the economic field.
In the absence of a correct strategic vision, Iran's numerous capacities and advantages in the field of trade and commerce have been suspended, and the creation of suitable and optimal transit routes and commercial corridors from Iran's territory has been neglected. Iran's rival regional powers, with the cooperation of Iran's neighbors and the support of world powers, have defined numerous international transportation corridors and energy pipeline projects that have practically bypassed Iran's optimal position and excluded Iran from international projects. It seems that the regional powers do not consider the Islamic Republic of Iran as a reliable and trustworthy partner in joint economic cooperation and do not tie their interests with Iran.
In the past four decades, the ideological geopolitical strategy of the Islamic Republic of Iran has hindered the prioritization of the economy in Iran's policies, especially in foreign policy.
Resilience of Iran's economy and reduction of vulnerability cannot be researched by the strategy of isolationism and closed door policy of the Islamic Republic of Iran. The geo-economic strategy and vision based on maritime orientation, which clearly supports the policies of open doors and increasing trade and commerce networks to be placed in the space of currents, can be the key and open the way for Iran to develop in the new world.
Conclusion
In the new world relations, Iran needs to review its macro policies and development strategy to benefit from its unique capacities. Although Iran is intrinsically located in a focal and hinged position among

 
many neighbors and geopolitical regions, from the perspective of geo-economics and the structure of the flow space, it is in the margin and isolation of the world. The research results show that Iran needs geo-economic insight and maritime strategy to activate its geographic and territorial capacities and advantages. Iran, in the light of geo-economic insight, can be inserted in the processes of regional development and the space of currents. By adopting the geo-economic vision and maritime strategy, ports and coastal areas, especially the Makran region, will become the drivers of Iran's development.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Geo-economics
Maritime Strategy
Economic Corridors
Development
1)       اطلس جامع گیتاشناسی (1382). تهران: انتشارات موسس جغرافیا و کارتوگرافی گیتاشناسی.
2)       آمار نامه دریایی ایران (1395). معاونت علمی و فناوری ریاست جمهوری، ستاد توسعه فناوری و صنایع دانش بنیان دریایی.
3)       حافظ نیا، محمدرضا (1386). قدرت و منافع ملی: مبانی، مفاهیم و روشهای سنجش، تهران: نشر انتخاب.
4)       روشندل، جلیل (1399). امنیت ملی و نظام بین المللی، تهران: سمت.
5)       عزتی، عزت‌اله و ویسی، هادی (1385). تحلیل ژئوپلیتیک و ژئواکونومی خط لوله گاز ایران ـ هند. فصلنامه بین المللی ژئوپلیتیک، 2(4)، 45-27.
6)       کاظمی، علی اصغر (1370). نقش قدرت در جامعه و روابط بین المللی، تهران: قومس.
7)       کریمی پور، یداله (1379). ایران و همسایگان، تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه خوارزمی.
8)       کریمی­پور، یدالله (1394). جغرافیا نخست در خدمت صلح، به کوشش حسین خالدی و پرستو موفقیان، چاپ دوم، تهران: نشر انتخاب.
9)       مرکز آمار ایران (1400). سالنامه آماری ایران 1400. سازمان برنامه و بودجه کشور.
10)   ویسی، هادی (1396). بررسی رقابتهای ژئوپلیتیکی و ژئواکونومی پاکستان و ایران در ایجاد کریدور جنوبی ـ شمالی اورآسیا: مزیتها و تهدیدها، فصلنامه ژئوپلیتیک، 13(45): 101-124.
11)   ویسی، هادی (1400). بررسی رقابتهای ژئوپلیتیکی و ژئواکونومیک چین و هند در اورآسیا: کریدورهای ارتباطی و ژئوپلیتیک بنادر چابهار و گوادر، پژوهش‌های جغرافیای انسانی، 53(1)، 213-226.
12)   ویسی، هادی (1404). تبیین ضرورت راهبرد ژئواکونومیک در توسعۀ سواحل مکران، جغرافیا و توسعه ناحیه‌ای، 23(1)، 47-27.
13)   Baru, S. (2012). Geo-economics and strategy, Survival Global Politics and Strategy, 54, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2012.690978.
14)   Beeson, M. (2018). Geoeconomics with Chinese characteristics: the BRI and China’s evolving grand strategy, Economic and Political Studies, 6(3), 240-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2018.1498988
15)   Bishoyi, S. (2016). Geostrategic Imperative of the Indo-Pacific Region Emerging Trends and Regional Responses, Journal of Defence Studies, 10(1), 89–102.  https://www.idsa.in/system/files/jds/jds_10_1_2015_geostrategic-imperative-of-the-indo-pacific-region.pdf.
16)  Blackwill,  R.D.,  &  Harris,  J. (2016).  War  By  Other  Means:  Geoeconomics  and  Statecraft  (1  ed). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
17)   BP (2020). Statistical Review of World Energy, 69th edition. British Petroleum.
18)   Campling, L. & Colas, A. (2021). Capitalism and the Sea: The Maritime Factor in the Making of the Modern World, Verso.
19)   Chen, j., Fei, Y., Lee, P. (2019). Overseas Port Investment Policy for China’s Central and Local Governments in the Belt and Road Initiative, Journal of Contemporary China, 28(116), 196-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1511392
20)  Comprehensive Atlas of Gitashenasi (2003), Tehran: Institute of Gitashenasi. [In Persian].
21)   Dicken, P. (2015). Global Shift: Mapping the changing Contours of the World Economy; New York: The Guilford Press.
22)   Domosh, M. (2013). Geoeconomic Imaginations and Economic Geography in the Early Twentieth Century. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(4), 944–966. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2011.653740.
23)  Ezzati,E. and Veicy,H. (2006). Analysis of the Geopolitics and Geo-Economy of Iran – India Gas Pipeline. Geopolitics Quarterly2(4), 27-45. [In Persian]. https://journal.iag.ir/article_57517_b6952e403e52ff901127c4701a2a3852.pdf.
24)   Glassner, M. (1993). Political Geography, New York: John Wiley & sons.
25)  Goldstein, J. & Pevehouse, J.C. (2014). International Relations, Tenth edition, Pearson.
26)   Hafeznia, M.R. (2010), National Power and Interests: Sources, Concepts and Measurement Methods, Tehran: Entekhab. [In Persian].
27)   Holslag, J. (2016). ‘Geoeconomics in a Globalized World: the Case of China’s Export Policy’, Asia Europe Journal, 14(2), 173–184.
28)   Hsiung JC. (2009). The age of geoeconomics, China’s global role, and prospects of cross-strait integration. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 14, 113–133.
29)   Iran Maritime Statistics (2016). Vice Presidency for Science and Technology, Technology Development Headquarter and Maritime Knowledge-Based Industries. [In Persian].
30)   Johnson, O., & Choudhury, P. (2020). Maritime Theory Approach for Functional Effectiveness in the Indo-Pacific. India Quarterly, 76(3), 1–17
31)  Karimipour, Y. (2000), Iran and Neighbors, Tehran: Khwarazmi University Press. [In Persian].
32)   Karimipour, Y. (2014), Geography Services, First and foremost, to make peace, (a survey of iran and its neighbors relations), by effort of H. Khaledi and P. Movafaghiyan, 2nd edition, Tehran: Entekhab publishing. [Persian].
33)  Kazemi, A.A. (1990), The role of power in society and international relations, Tehran: Qoms Publishing. [In Persian].
34)   Khan, M.Z. (2019). From Geo-Economics to Geo-Politics: Emerging Maritime Power-Politics in the Indo-Pacific Ocean Region, Margalla Papers, 2, 28-40.
35)   Liang, Y., Mingxing C., Dadao L., Zijin D., and Zheng, Z. (2019). "The Spatial Evolution of Geoeconomic Pattern among China and Neighboring Countries since the Reform and Opening-Up" Sustainability, 11(7), 2168.
36)   Lipkan, V., Kuznichenko, O., & Ivanov, A. (2023). Geoeconomics as a Tool of Modern Geostrategy. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 9(1), 113-123.
37)   Mahan, A.T. (1890). The Influence of Sea Power Upon History, 1660-1783, Boston: Little Brown and Company.
38)   Morgenthau, H., Thompson, K., Clinton, D. (2005). Politics Among Nations, 7th Edition, McGraw-Hill Education.
39)  Muir, R. (1987). Modern Political Geography, London: MacMillan.
40)   Noorali, H., Flint, C., Ahmadi, S.A. (2022). Port power: Towards a new geopolitical world order, Journal of Transport Geography, 105, 103483.
41)  Roshandel, J. (1995), National Security and International System, Tehran: Samt. [In Persian].
42)   Scholvina, S.; Wigell, M. (2018). Power politics by economic means: Geoeconomics as an analytical approach and foreign policy practice. Comparative Strategy, 37(1), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2018.1419729
43)   Spykman, N.J. (1942). America's Strategy in World Politics, New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
44)  Statistical Center of Iran (1400). Statistical Yearbook of Iran 1400. National Planning and Budget Organization. [In Persian].
45)   Stavridis, J. (2017). Sea Power: The History and Geopolitics of the World's Oceans, Penguin Press.
46)   Szabo SF. (2015). Germany, Russia, and the rise of geo-economics. Bloomsbury, London.
47)   United States Department of Defense (2019). Indo-Pacific strategy report: Preparedness, partnerships and promoting a networked region. The Department of Defense. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/AD1082324.pdf.
48)   Veicy, H. (2025). Explaining the Necessity of a Geo-economic Strategy for the Development of Makran Coasts. Journal of Geography and Regional Development23(1), 27-47. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22067/jgrd.2024.81544.1258.
49)   Veicy, H. (2021). A Study of Geopolitical and Geo-economic Competitions of China and India in Eurasia: Connection Corridors and Geopolitics of Chabahar and Gwadar Ports. Human Geography Research53(1), 213-226. [Persian].
50)   Veicy, H. (2017). Investigation of the Geopolitical and Geo-economic Competitions of Pakistan and Iran to Create South-North Corridor of Eurasia: Preferences and Threats. Geopolitics Quarterly13(45), 101-124. [Persian].
51)   Wakelin, J. (1965). The Roots of Diplomacy: how to study inter-state relations, Routledge.
52)   Wigell, M. (2016). Conceptualizing regional powers’ geoeconomic strategies: neo-imperialism, neo-mercantilism, hegemony, and liberal institutionalism, Asia Europe Journal, 14, 135-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-015-0442-x.
53)  Wigell, M., Scholvin, S. & Aaltola, M. (2019). Geo-economics and power politics in the 21st century: The revival of economic statecraft. Routledge