جغرافیا  (نشریۀ انجمن جغرافیایی ایران)

جغرافیا (نشریۀ انجمن جغرافیایی ایران)

تأثیر انواع مالکیت زمین‌های وقفی، دولتی و خصوصی بر پایداری محیط‌زیست: مطالعه موردی : شهرستان‌ سوادکوه استان مازندران

نوع مقاله : مقاله مستخرج از رساله دکتری

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی ، گروه برنامه ریزی شهری و روستایی ، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل،
2 استاد گروه برنامه ریزی شهری و روستایی ، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی ، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی
3 استاد گروه برنامه ریزی شهری و روستایی
4 دانشیار گروه برنامه ریزی شهری و روستایی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی
چکیده
در اکثر جوامع، حق مالکیت و استفاده از زمین به عنوان یک حق اساسی و یک شرط اساسی برای بهره وری اقتصادی ثروت افراد، جوامع و دولت ها تلقی می شود. در برابر مشکلات مالکیت زمین، نیاز به یک واکنش جهانی هماهنگ و منطقی از جمله تغییر در استفاده از منابع و الگوهای مصرف انرژی، اتخاذ تدابیر حقوقی و سیاستی مناسب بین‌المللی و ملی، و اصلاح حقوق و مسئولیت‌های فردی دارند. این پژوهش به بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر پایداری محیط‌زیست با استفاده ازPLS-SEM پرداخت. پژوهش حاضر از نظر هدف، کاربردی و از نظر روش تحقیق پیمایشی و از نظر ماهیت داده‌ها، صفت اسمی - ترتیبی است. داده‌ها از طریق پرسش‌نامه روستاییان در مقیاس لیکرت گردآوری شد. جامعه آماری شامل مالکان و بهره‌برداران اراضی شهرستان‌ سوادکوه بود. نمونه‌گیری به روش تصادفی طبقه‌ای انجام شد. تعداد 34 روستا انتخاب شد و جمعیت این 34 روستا برابر با 8113 نفر شد. برای تعیین حجم نمونه از فرمول شارل کوکران استفاده شد و حجم نمونه برابر با 383 نفر شد. با استفاده از روش روایی ترکیبی (CR) میزان روایی تمامی متغیرها بالاتر از 7/0 شد و روایی پرسشنامه تأیید شد. و پایایی آن با آلفای کرونباخ (87/0) سنجیده شدکه میزان پایایی را در حد بسیار بالایی تأیید کرد. یافته ها نشان داد که حاکمیت قانون و نظارت (=0/41β) کیفیت مدیریت زمین (=0/35β)، اندازه و نوع مالکیت (=0/28β)، حمایت آموزشی و فرهنگی (=0/26β) و بستر اقتصادی – فرهنگی (=0/24β) همگی تأثیرات مثبت و معناداری بر پایداری محیط زیست دارند. نتایج نشان داد که مدل توانست 69% از واریانس شاخص پایداری محیط زیست دارند. مدل توانست 69% از واریانس شاخص پایداری محیط زیست را تبیین کند. یافته ها بر اهمیت رویکرد جامع در سیاست گذاری های زیست محیطی تأکید دارند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

The Impact of Different Types of Land Ownership (Endowment, State-Owned, and Private) on Environmental Sustainability: A Case Study of Savadkuh County, Mazandaran Province

نویسندگان English

Ayyoub Amani 1
vakil heidari Sareban 2
Arastoo Yari Hesar 3
bahram imani 4
1 Ph. D Student of Urban and Rural Planning, Faculty of Social Science, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran.
2 Department of Urban & Rural , Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
3 Professor of Urban and Rural Planning, Faculty of Social Science, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
4 Associate Professor of Urban and Rural Planning, Faculty of Social Science, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil
چکیده English

Extended Abstract
Introduction
Land, as one of the most important natural and economic resources, plays a fundamental role in the livelihoods of rural communities and environmental sustainability. The way land is owned, managed, and utilized can have significant consequences for natural resources and environmental conditions. In mountainous areas, land fragmentation, diverse land-ownership systems, weak institutional oversight, and land-use changes are among the factors that can intensify pressure on environmental resources. The Savadkuh County, with its valuable forests, rangelands, rivers, and rich biodiversity, has considerable potential for providing ecosystem services; however, land-use changes, natural-resource exploitation, and weaknesses in management and supervision may adversely affect its environmental sustainability. Therefore, identifying the factors associated with land ownership and management, educational and technical support, the rule of law, and socioeconomic and cultural conditions is essential for strengthening environmental sustainability in the region. Accordingly, the present study aims to identify and explain the factors affecting environmental sustainability in the rural areas of Savadkuh County. To this end, the relationships between land ownership and management-related variables and the environmental sustainability index were examined using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)..
Methodology
This research is applied in terms of objective, survey in terms of method and uses nominal –ordinal qualitative data. Data were collected from villagers using a likret scale questionnaire. The statistical population comprised landowners and land users in savadkouh county. Stratified random sampling was employed. 34 villages were selected , with a total population of 8131 people. The sample size was determined using Cochrans sample size formula. Resulting in a sample size 383 individuals. Content validity for all variables was assessed using the Combined Relevancy method, with all validity scores exceeding 0/7, thus confirming the questionnaires validity. Reliability was measured using Cronbachs alpha, which yielded a score of 0/87, indicating a very high level of reliability. Data were collected through questionnaire and analyzed using SmartPL software.
Results and Discussion
The constructs examined included: ownership sized and type, land management quality, educational and technical support, rule of law and supervision, and supervision, and economic cultural context, all serving as predictors for the environmental sustainability index, path analysis results revealed that all predictor variables exerted a significant positive influence on the environmental sustainability index. Notably, rule of law and supervision emerged as the strongest direct predictor with a standard path coefficient (β=0/41). This was followed by land management quality (β=0/35), ownership size and type (β=0/28), educational and technical support, (β=0/26), and economic-cultural context (β=0/24).

Conclusion
The coefficient of determination (R²) for the model was 0/69, demonstrating the models high explanatory power (69%) in accounting for the variance in the environmental sustainability index. These finding emphasize the necessity of a multifaceted approach, encompassing institutional strengthening, improved management practices, investment in education, and consideration of contextual factors to achieve environmental sustainability. The research further contextualizes its findings by comparing them with relevant theories and previous studies, highlighting the need for coordinated policies across different levels and suggesting limitations and future research directions.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

land management
environmental sustainability
land governance
PLS-SEM model
Savadkoh
Abbasi, E., Moghadam, M., & Afifi, M. E. (2025). Analysis of land use resilience for sustainable development: A case study of Firuzabad City. Journal of Geography, 23 (87), 66-82. https://doi.org/10.22034/jiga.2026.2054390.1381[Persian].
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavaior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Bamri, F., & Afifi, M. E. (2024). Determining critical areas of land use change using remote sensing methods and satellite images (Case study: Bandar Abbas city). Journal of Geography, 22 (82), 46-68. https://doi.org/10.22034/iga.2025.2045564.1347
Bourdieu, B. (1968). The forms of capital. Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. 241-258. Greenwood Press. https://home.iitk.ac.in/~amman/soc748/bourdieu_forms_of_capital.pdf
Boyd, D. R. (2003). Unnatural law: Rethinking Canadian environmental law and policy. UBC Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274692393_Unnatural_Law_Rethinking_Canadian_Environmental_Law_and_Policy
Brainard, J., Jones , R. & Matthews, A. (2020). Good governance at micro scale: Lessons from alpine communities. Mountian research and development, 40(3), 240-254. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/383620538_Mountain_Governance
Chen, L., & Li, J. (2020). Land tenure and sustainable land management in china: Empirical evidence from household data. Land use policy, 99, 104877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104877
Demsetz, H. (1967). Toward a Theoryof property rights. American Economic Review, 57(2), 347-359. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1821637
Field, B. (2001). Natural resource economics: A n introduction, New York. NY: Mcgraw-Hill https://climber.uml.edu.ni/fetch.php/Resources/Me4i59/NaturalResourceEconomicsAnIntroductionBarryCField.pdf.
Griggs, D., Smith, M., Gaffency, O., Rockstrom, J., Ohman, M., Glaser, P. & Steffen., C. (2013). Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature, 495(7441), 305-307.https: //doi.org/10. 1038/495305a. https://doi.org/10.1038/495305a
Habess, F. (2021). Socioecological governance frameworks in local sustainability transitions. Sustainability, 13(12), 6783. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126783
Jamaluddins, F., Hidayat, R., & Noor, S. (2021). Integrating environmental education and financial empowerment in marginalized communities. Environmental education research, 27(5), 635-648. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2021.1895982
Katouzian, N. (2025). Property and Ownership. Mizan Publications, 61st edition. https://www.hovalvakil.com/product/267/ [Persian].
Kopf, E., Allan, F. (2022). Institutional approaches to land tenure and environmental mamagement. Land Use policy,118, 106072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106072
Krusekopf, C. C. (2003). Diversity in land tenure arrangements under the household responsibility system in China. China Economic Review, 13(2–3), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1043-951X(02)00090-2
Kumar, S., Zhing, L., & Toress, M. (2024). Land ownership and sustainability policies in mixed gevrnance systems. Land Use Policy, 138, 107668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107668
Leknoi, U., Wickramasinghe, K., Gupta, S. & Thongyou, M. (2023). Strengthening science–policy interface for sustainable food systems in Southeast Asia. Sustainability Science, 18(3), 1123–1139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01267-z
Li, B., & Shen, Y. (2021). Effects of land transfer quality on the application of organic fertilizer by large-scale farmers in China. Land Use Policy, 100, 105124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105124
Liu, Y., Chen, F. & Matthews, R. (2025). Land tenure transition and ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 72, 102048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.102048
 
Mafiz, M., & Yusef, H. (2023). Property rights and environmental efficiency: Insights from rural India. Ecological economics, 210, 107279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107279
Moghani Rahimi, B. (2020). Feasibility study of healthy city planning with sustainable development approach (Four districts of Kerman city). Journal of Geography, 18 (67), 132-141. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.27172996.1399.18.4.10.1[Persian].
Mubareke, O., Reyes, S. (2023).  Cultural determinants of land conversation behaviors in middle eastern rural systems. Enviroment, Development and sustainability, 25(7). 15942-15959. https: //doi.org/10. 1016/j. jenvman.2023.119186.
Nash, R., Edwads, H., Browne, A. & Torres, P. (2022). Property rights and collective environmental resilience. World Development, 156, 105872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105872
Nathan, J. B., Clausen, S., Oleary, T., Morrison, A. & Hagedorn, K. (2025). Integrated land governance for a sustainability. Nature Sustainability, 8(2), 113-128. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-025-01311-5
Nkonya, E., Mirzabaev, A. & von Braun, J. (Eds.). (2016). Economics of land degradation and improvement: A global assessment for sustainable development. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19168-3
North, D. (1990). Institutional, Institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge UniversityPress.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228179880_Institutions_Institutional_Change_and_Economic_Performance
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/governing-the-commons
Purvis, B., Mao, Y. & Robinson, D. (2023). Revisiting the three pillars of sustainability in the anthropocene. Environmental Science & Policy, 145, 103281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103281
Rahman, A., & Rashid, M. (2021). Institutional quality and and sustainable development: Evidence from Pakistans rural regions. Journal of environmental planning and management, 64(2), 321-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2020.1765749
Rigi, M., Piri Sahragard, H., Dehmarde Ghaleh No, M. R., & Shahraki, E. (2018). Evaluation of land use changes using remote sensing data (Case study: Nokabad watershed, Khash County). Journal of Geography, 16 (59), 192-204. https://mag.iga.ir/article_248654.html[Persian].  
Safarnejad, A., & Saeidi, A. (2019). The transformation process of rural texture in the evolution process of land use system, with reference to the villages of Ardabil region (1976-2016). Journal of Geography, 17 (63), 28-39. https://mag.iga.ir/article_246003.html[Persian].
Shamsaei, N., Mahdavi, R., Khorani, A., & Gholami, H. (2024). Investigating the trend of vegetation cover changes under the influence of climatic elements of land surface temperature, actual evapotranspiration and precipitation in Hormozgan province. Journal of Geography, 22 (83), 94-121. https://doi.org/10.22034/jiga.2025.2036593.1319[Persian].
Smith, J., Lee, R. & Anderson, P. (2023). Land tenure security and environmental sustainability: A comparative analysis of state, private and communal lands in developing countries. Journal of Environmental Policy and Management, 28(3), 201-223. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362053564_Land_Tenure_Security_and_Sustainable_Development
Wilson, T., Chandra, D. & Lopez, G. (2025). Assessing the impact of land property rights on biodiversity conservation and sustainable land use. Global Land Studies, 19(1), 78-102. https://www.mdpi.com/1424-2818/16/10/630
Xiao, H., & Kang, X. (2021). Influence of rural labor migration behavior on the transfer of forestland: Evidence from China. Natural Resource Modeling, 34(2), e12293. https://doi.org/10.1111/nrm.12293
Zaharuddin, M., Rahman, R. & Rashid, A. (2022). Goverance and environmental sustainability in rural Malaysia. Sustainability, 14(4), 2341. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14042341
Zhang, K., Li, X., Zhou, W., Zhang, D. & Yu, Z. (2016). Land resource degradation in China:  Analysis of status, trends and strategy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(4), 397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13040397