تبیین شهر تاب آور بر اساس برنامه ریزی شهری با رویکرد تاکتیکالی (نمونه موردی: منطقه 14 شهرداری تهران)

نوع مقاله : مقاله مستخرج از رساله دکتری

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای رشته جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد یادگار امام (ره) شهرری، ایران.

2 استادیار جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی روستایی ، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد یادگار امام (ره) شهرری، ایران.

3 استادیار جغرافیای طبیعی ، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد یادگار امام (ره) شهرری، ایران.

چکیده

شهرسازی تاکتیکال یک مفهوم کلی برای توصیف مجموعه‌ای از تغییرات موقت و کم‌هزینه در محیط میباشد . پژوهش حاضر با هدف تبیین شهر تاب آور بر اساس برنامه ریزی شهری با رویکرد تاکتیکالی درمنطقه 14 شهرداری تهران در دو بخش نظری و میدانی صورت گرفته است. بخش نظری آن مبتنی بر مطالعات کتابخانه ای بوده که به جمع آوری و دسته بندی نظریات مختلف پرداخته شد. در روش میدانی، جهت شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی عوامل موثر بر نوآوری خدمت از نظرات خبرگان استفاده شد و اطلاعات گردآوری و مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت. تعداد 100 نفر با روش نمونه گیری انتخاب شدند. این پژوهش از نظر هدف، از نوع کاربردی و از نظر روش از نوع توصیفی – تحلیلی و روش گردآوری اطلاعات بصورت میدانی و با روش دفی فازی و خوب ترین و بدترین به تحلیل این موضوع پرداخته شد. با توجه به یافته های تحقیق وزن نهایی شاخص‌ها از میانگین هندسی اوزان محاسبه شده در وزن و رتبه در بین معیارهای اصلی، مشارکت با وزن 0.285 رتبه اول، معیار حضور پذیری با وزن 0.249 رتبه دوم را کسب کرده است. با توجه به یافته ها می توان دریافت که در شهرتاب آور زمینه های لازم بهره گیری از شهرسازی تاکتیکال را دارد. با توجه به یافته های تحقیق میانگین نمرة شهرسازی تاکتیکال برابر با 62/35 با کمترین نمره 18 و بیشترین نمره 52 و میانگین نمرة تاب آوری برابر با 79/70 با کمترین نمره 57 و بیشترین نمره 67 بود، لذا چنین استنباط می شود که بین مولفه های شهرسازی تاکتیکال و تاب آوری رابطه معناداری وجود دارد

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Explaining a resilient city based on urban planning with a tactical approach (Case study: District 14 of Tehran Municipality)

نویسندگان [English]

  • hamid reza Askari 1
  • Tahmineh Daniali 2
  • Mohammad Hemmati 3
1 Department of Geography and Urban Planning , Yadegar-e-Imam khomeini (RAH) Shahre Rey Branch, Islamic Azad University , Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Geography, Yadegar-e-Imam Khomeini (RAH) Shahrerey Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran.
3 Assistant Professor of Geography, Yadegar-e-Imam Khomeini (RAH) Shahrerey Branch, Islamic Azad University, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Extended Abstract
Introduction
Resilience means thinking and creating measures to quickly return to the original state after an incident. A city without resilient infrastructure is highly vulnerable to disasters. With the increasing environmental challenges facing humans in the modern era, this concept has been expanded in various fields of science and redefined by scientists in different disciplines. This approach is seen as a suitable alternative to rigid and engineered approaches. A resilient community is capable of returning relatively quickly to its previous state, while a community with less resilience may take longer to recover or may not be able to recover at all. Iran is among the countries with very high vulnerability to natural disasters due to its geographical and geological conditions. 7.31% of its total area is in areas at risk of natural disasters, and 70% of the country's population reside in areas at risk. Increased resilience and decreased vulnerability among local communities allow for the continuous and sustainable development of residents in the face of natural threats, and subsequent disasters cannot disrupt people's lives. Therefore, explaining the relationship between resilience to threats and reducing their effects, with emphasis on its dimension, is of great importance. Therefore, if the quality of public spaces improves, the voluntary presence of citizens increases, and therefore, the possibility of diverse and higher quality activities is provided. The geographical scope of the research is district 14 of Tehran Municipality, which is one of the densely populated areas of the city and located in the eastern outskirts of Tehran. This area has very suitable welfare facilities and services, and housing costs are very reasonable, so it has a high population density and is known for its small size. This research aims to explain the resilient city based on urban planning with a tactical approach in district 14 of Tehran Municipality.
 
Methodology
The present study consists of two theoretical and empirical sections. The theoretical section is based on library studies which focus on collecting and categorizing different theories. In the empirical method, expert opinions were used to identify and rank the influential factors on service innovation, and the information was collected and analyzed. In this research, due to the large number of experts, a sampling method was used and 100 experts were selected. This study is of an applied type in terms of purpose, and of a descriptive-analytical type in terms of method, and the information gathering method is empirical. After extracting the indicators based on expert opinions, the hierarchical analysis process is carried out to analyze them. The method of data analysis in this research is based on the prioritization model of factors affecting urban planning with a tactical approach, and examining the city's resilience using fuzzy Delphi and fuzzy BWM methods. Initially, the indicators are validated or screened by the fuzzy Delphi method, and finally weighted using the fuzzy BWM method.
 
Results and Discussion
District 14 of the Tehran municipality is one of the areas within the city of Tehran. Located along the course of the Red River, it originates from the eastern heights of Tehran and flows southward. Due to physical, functional, social, economic, and environmental issues, the older parts of the district have unfavorable conditions. However, guidelines for identifying these areas focus on the physical-structural aspects, and 3 criteria of instability, granularity, and penetrability have been used to recognize these districts. Among the sub-criteria for downtime-related issues, the existence of aesthetic elements has obtained the highest rank with a weight of 0.425. The presence of suitable urban furniture has obtained the second rank with a weight of 0.323, and the status of the coverage of alleys and streets has obtained the third rank with a weight of 0.25. The results demonstrate that there are appropriate opportunities for tactical urbanism in the resilient city. Researchers have also studied the measurement of social resilience in urban environments using statistical methods and have provided various frameworks, indicating that there are differences in the components and indices employed at the regional level. Researchers have emphasized topics such as physical and social resilience in historical contexts, the use of resilience indices in metropolitan management, strategic crisis management with an urban resilience approach, and the need for implementing executive programs to improve urban infrastructure resilience and using appropriate indicators and models to measure urban resilience.Regarding resilience and the use of the tactical approach, the average score for tactical urbanism was 35.62, with a minimum score of 18 and a maximum score of 52, while the average score for resilience was 70.79, with a minimum score of 57 and a maximum score of 67. The average score for presence was 10.12, with a minimum score of 4 and a maximum score of 16. The average score for downtime was 16.73, with a minimum score of 7 and a maximum score of 28, and the average score for participation was 10.12, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 7. The correlation coefficient obtained from the components of tactical urbanism with resilience was significant at 99% confidence, indicating a meaningful relationship between the two at a 0.01 level of significance.
 
Conclusion
General, tactical urbanism can be defined as a new approach that is based on community participation and the use of short-term, high-impact projects. Tactical urbanism requires taking into account some design principles to create dynamic and vibrant public spaces. Nowadays, much of the literature on urbanism discusses the ideals of tactical urbanism. Harrison notes that the characteristics of this approach include everyday spaces for public activity and the recognition that these features and everyday urban activities constitute a social product. Citizens are practically living in a tactical city every day since they follow a flexible planning in using the environment and demand active participation in shaping the urban space. Citizen participation is the first factor in achieving tactical urbanism in such a way that the neglect and lack of participation of citizens will lead to undesired outcomes. Tactical urbanism is a broad concept used to describe a variety of temporary and low-cost changes made to the built environment. These changes are usually made in cities with the goal of improving the condition of neighborhoods and public places.
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Resilient City
  • Urban Planning
  • Tactical Approach
  • Tehran Municipality District 14
  1. استعلاجی، فراز؛ عباسی سمنانی؛ علیرضا و علی پوری، احسان (1398). ارزیابی تاب آوری ناحیه خوزستان در برابر سیل با رویکرد مدیریت بحران. جغرافیا ( فصلنامه علمی انجمن جغرافیایی ایران)، دوره17، شماره63، صص. 245-231.
  2. امانی، حمیدرضا؛ عزت پناه، بختیار و شمس، مجید (1400). تحلیل عوامل موثر بر تاب آوری مراکز حساس و حیاتی شهری مبتنی بر پدافند غیرعامل، مطالعه موردی: منطقه 11 کلانشهر تهران. جغرافیا ( فصلنامه علمی انجمن جغرافیایی ایران)، دوره19، شماره70، صص. 118-97.
  3. برزگری، محمدرضا و شیخ کاظم، احمد (1392). مطالعه آسیب پذیری محیط های شهری در مقابل حریق مبتنی بر رویکرد شهر تاب آور، کنفرانس بین المللی مدیریت جامع بحران های طبیعی، صص. 3-2.
  4. بهرامی، فرشاد؛ آل هاشمی، آیدا و متدین، حشمت اله (1398). رودخانه های شهری و تفکر تاب آوری در برابر آشوب سیل، برنامه ریزی تاب آور رودخانه کن، دوره 11، شماره 47، صص. 73-60.
  5. داداش پور، هام و عادلی، زینب (1394). سنجش ظرفیت های تاب آوری در مجموعه شهری قزوین. مدیریت بحران،دوره4، شماره8، صص.84-73. https://sid.ir/paper/226035
  6. دلشاد، مهدیه؛ طبیبیان، منوچهر و حبیبی، سیدمحسن (1400). واکاوی مفهوم تاب آوری فضایی-کالبدی در برابر زلزله, معرفی و اولویت بندی مهمترین معیارهای آن با استفاده از مدل Fuzzy-AHP مور د مطالعاتی: بافت مرکزی شهر رشت. معماری و شهرسازی آرمان شهر، دوره14، شماره36، صص. 223-204.
  7. ذاکر، حقیقی، کیانوش و کوکه (1400). بررسی عوامل مؤثر بر تاب آوری کالبدی شهر با تأکید بر مخاطرات طبیعی، مقاله علمی پژوهشی دانشگاه تبریز، دوره5، شماره 17، صص. 25-12.
  8. رضایی، محمدرضا (1392). ارزیابی تاب آوری اقتصادی و نهادی جوامع شهری در برابر سوانح طبیعی، مطالعه موردی، زلزله محله های شهرتهران، دوفصلنامه مدیریت بحران، دوره 2، شماره 1، صص. 14-12.
  9. رضایی، محمدرضا؛ بسطامی نیا، امیر و فخرایی پور، امید (1394). بررسی ابعاد, رویکردها و مفاهیم تاب آوری در جوامع شهری با تاکید بر سوانح طبیعی. کنفرانس بین المللی پژوهش در علوم و تکنولوژی. https://sid.ir/paper/871704
  10. رهنمایی، محمد تقی و پورموسوی، سید موسی (1385). بررسی ناپایداری امنیتی کلانشهر تهران، مجله پژوهشهای جغرافیایی، دوره، 16، شماره 57، صص. 193-177.
  11. رهنمایی، محمدتقی و پروانه شاه حسینی(1383). فرایند برنامه‌ریزی شهری در ایران، تهران: انتشارات سمت. چاپ اول.
  12. سعیدنیا، احمد (1378) کتاب سبز راهنمای شهرداری­ها، کاربری زمین شهری، تهران: انتشارات مرکز مطالعات برنامه­ریزی شهری وزارت کشور، چاپ اول.
  13. شریف نیا، فاطمه (1391). برنامه ریزی کاربری زمین جهت ارتقای تاب آوری در برابر زلزله، نمونه موردی منطقه 10 شهرداری تهران. پایان نامه کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه تهران، پردیس هنرهای زیبا، گروه شهرسازی.
  14. صالحی، اسماعیل؛ آقابابایی، محمدتقی؛ سرمدی، هاجر و فرزادبهتاش، محمدرضا (1390). بررسی میزان تاب آوری محیطی با استفاده از مدل شبکه علیت. محیط شناسی،دوره17، شماره59، صص. 112-99.
  15. صلاحی اصفهانی، گیتی (1400). ارزیابی تاب آوری اجتماعی-اقتصادی روستاهای حوزه آبخیز سامان (استان مرکزی) در نوسانات آب سالهای اخیر. جغرافیا ( فصلنامه علمی انجمن جغرافیایی ایران)، دوره19، شماره68، صص. 204-185.
  16. یدالله نیا، هاجر؛ رجایی، سید عباس؛ پور احمد، احمد و خراسانی،  محمد امین (1400). اثرات گسترش فیزیکی بر تاب‌آوری زیست‌محیطی شهر بابل. جغرافیا ( فصلنامه علمی انجمن جغرافیایی ایران)، دوره19، شماره69، صص. 150-131.
  17. Artmann, M., Inostroza, L. & Fan, P. (2019). Urban sprawl, compact urban development and green cities. How much do we know, how much do we agree?. Ecological indicators, No.96, pp. 3-9.
  18. Bolin, B., Watson, R.T. & Noble, I.R. (2000). Land use, land-use change and forestry: a special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. World Bank, Washington, DC 20433 USA. Land use, land-use change and forestry: a special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
  19. Barzegari, M. & Sheikhkazem, A. (2012). Studying the vulnerability of urban environments against fire based on the resilient city approach, International Conference on Comprehensive Management of Natural Disasters, pp. 3-2. [Persian].
  20. Bahrami, F., Al-Hashmi, A. & Mutadeen, H. (2018). Urban rivers and resilience thinking against flood chaos, Ken River Resilience Planning, Vol.11, No. 47, pp. 73-60. [Persian].
  21. Cimellaro, G. P., Renschler, C., Reinhorn, A. M. & Arendt, L. (2016). PEOPLES: a framework for evaluating resilience. Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol.142, No.10.
  22. Connelly, E. B., Allen, C. R., Hatfield, K., Palma-Oliveira, J. M., Woods, D. D. & Linkov, I. (2017). Features of resilience. Environment systems and decisions, No.37, pp.46-50.
  23. Dadashpour, H. & Adeli, Z. (2014). Measuring resilience capacities in Qazvin urban complex. Crisis Management, Volume 4, Number 8, pp. 73-84. https://sid.ir/paper/226035
  24. Delshad, Mahdia; Tabibian, Manouchehr and Habibi, Seyyed Mohsen (1400). Analyzing the concept of physical-spatial resilience against earthquakes, introducing and prioritizing its most important criteria using Fuzzy-AHP model, case study: the central fabric of Rasht city. Arman Shahr Architecture and Urban Planning, Volume 14, Number 36, pp. 223-204. [Persian].
  25. Estealaji, H., Ezzatpanah, B. & Shams, M. (1400). Analysis of factors affecting the resilience of sensitive and critical urban centers based on passive defense, case study: District 11 of Tehran metropolis. Geography (Scientific Quarterly of the Iranian Geographical Society), Vol. 19, No. 70, pp. 118-97. [Persian].
  26. Mitchell, T. & Harris, K. (2019). Resilience: a risk management approach, background note.
  27. Novak, D. C., Wu, Z. & Dooley, K. J. (2021). Whose resilience matters? Addressing issues of scale Satelaghi, Faraz; Abbasi Semnani; Alireza and Ali Puri, Ehsan (2018). Assessing the resilience of Khuzestan region against floods with a crisis management approach. Geography (Scientific Quarterly of the Iranian Geographical Society), Volume 17, Number 63, pp. 245-231.
  28. Rezaei, Mohammad Reza (2012). Evaluating the economic and institutional resilience of urban communities against natural disasters, case study, earthquake in Shahratehran neighborhoods, bi-quarterly journal of crisis management, volume 2, number 1, pp. 12-14. [Persian].
  29. Rezaei, M. Bastaminia, A. & Fakhraipour, O. (2014). Examining the dimensions, approaches and concepts of resilience in urban communities with an emphasis on natural disasters. International research conference in science and technology. [Persian]. https://sid.ir/paper/871704
  30. Rahmani, M. & Pourmousavi, S. (2005). Investigating the security instability of Tehran metropolis, Journal of Geographical Research, Volume, 16, No. 57, pp. 177-193. [Persian].
  31. Rahmani, Mohammad Taghi and Parvaneh Shah Hosseini (2013). The process of urban planning in Iran, Tehran: Somit Publications. First Edition. [Persian].
  32. Sara, S., Metcalf, E.S., Svendsen, LaDona Knigge, Hua Wang, Harvey, D.P. & Mary, E.N. (2016). Urban Greening as a Social Movement, Part of the Geotechnologies and the Environent book series (GEOTECH, Vol.14. No.46. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-26218-5_15
  33. Saeednia, A. (1999) The Green Book of Municipalities Guide, Urban Land Use, Tehran: Publications of the Center for Urban Planning Studies of the Ministry of Interior, first edition. [Persian].
  34. Salehi, I., Aghbabaei, M., Sarmadi, H. & Farzadbehtash, M. (2019). Investigating the level of environmental resilience using the causality network model. Environmental Science, Vol. 17, No.59, pp. 112-99. [Persian].
  35. Salahi Esfahani, G. (1400). Assessing the socio-economic resilience of villages in the Saman watershed (Central Province) in recent years' water fluctuations. Geography (Scientific Quarterly of the Iranian Geographical Society), Vol. 19, No. 68, pp. 204-185. [Persian].
  36. Sharif Nia, F. (2011). Land use planning to improve resilience against earthquakes, a case study of District 10 of Tehran Municipality. Master's thesis, University of Tehran, Faculty of Fine Arts, Department of Urbanism. [Persian].
  37. Zaker, H., Kianoosh & Koke (1400). Investigating factors affecting the physical resilience of the city with an emphasis on natural hazards, Tabriz University Scientific Research Paper, Vol. 5, NO. 17, pp. 12-25. [Persian].
  38. Yadullah Nia, H., Rajaee, A., Pourahmad, A. & Khorasani, M. (1400). The effects of physical expansion on the environmental resilience of Babol city. Geography (Scientific Quarterly of the Iranian Geographical Society), Vol. 19, No. 69, pp. 131-150. [Persian].